首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural Sciences >Do GMOs Accumulate Formaldehyde and Disrupt Molecular Systems Equilibria? Systems Biology May Provide Answers
【24h】

Do GMOs Accumulate Formaldehyde and Disrupt Molecular Systems Equilibria? Systems Biology May Provide Answers

机译:转基因生物会积累甲醛并破坏分子系统平衡吗?系统生物学可能提供答案

获取原文
       

摘要

Safety assessment of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) is a contentious topic. Proponents of GMOs assert that GMOs are safe since the FDA’s policy of substantial equivalence considers GMOs “equivalent” to their non-GMO counterparts, and argue that genetic modification (GM) is simply an extension of a “natural” process of plant breeding, a form of “genetic modification”, though done over longer time scales. Anti-GMO activists counter that GMOs are unsafe since substantial equivalence is unscientific and outdated since it originates in the 1970s to assess safety of medical devices, which are not comparable to the complexity of biological systems, and contend that targeted GM is not plant breeding. The heart of the debate appears to be on the methodology used to determine criteria for substantial equivalence. Systems biology, which aims to understand complexity of the whole organism, as a system, rather than just studying its parts in a reductionist manner, may provide a framework to determine appropriate criteria, as it recognizes that GM, small or large, may affect emergent properties of the whole system. Herein, a promising computational systems biology method couples known perturbations on five biomolecules caused by the CP4 EPSPS GM of Glycine max L. (soybean), with an integrative model of C1 metabolism and oxidative stress (two molecular systems critical to plant function). The results predict significant accumulation of formaldehyde and concomitant depletion of glutathione in the GMO, suggesting how a “small” and single GM creates “large” and systemic perturbations to molecular systems equilibria. Regulatory agencies, currently reviewing rules for GMO safety, may wish to adopt a systems biology approach using a combination of in silico, computational methods used herein, and subsequent targeted experimental in vitro and in vivo designs, to develop a systems understanding of “equivalence” using biomarkers, such as formaldehyde and glutathione, which predict metabolic disruptions, towards modernizing the safety assessment of GMOs.
机译:转基因生物(GMO)的安全性评估是一个有争议的话题。支持转基因生物的人断言,转基因生物是安全的,因为FDA的实质等效政策认为转基因生物与非转基因生物同等,并认为基因改造(GM)只是植物育种“自然”过程的延伸。 “遗传修饰”的形式,尽管需要更长的时间。反转基因生物主义者反驳说,转基因生物是不安全的,因为它的等效性是不科学的,因为自1970年代起就已经开始评估转基因生物,以评估医疗设备的安全性,这无法与生物系统的复杂性相提并论,并认为靶向转基因不是植物育种。辩论的核心似乎在于确定实质等同标准的方法。系统生物学旨在理解整个生物体的复杂性,而不是仅仅以还原论的方式研究其组成部分,而是提供了一个框架来确定适当的标准,因为它认识到,无论大小,转基因都可能影响紧急情况。整个系统的属性。本文中,一种有前途的计算系统生物学方法将已知的大豆(大豆)的CP4 EPSPS GM对5个生物分子的扰动与C1代谢和氧化应激的整合模型(两个对植物功能至关重要的分子系统)结合在一起。结果预测转基因生物中甲醛的大量积累和谷胱甘肽的消耗,这表明“小的”和单一的GM如何对分子系统平衡产生“大的”和系统性的干扰。目前正在审查转基因生物安全性规则的监管机构,不妨采用系统生物学方法,结合使用计算机模拟,本文使用的计算方法以及随后针对性的体外和体内实验设计,以形成对“等效性”的系统理解使用可预测代谢破坏的生物标记物(例如甲醛和谷胱甘肽)来实现转基因生物安全性评估的现代化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号