首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Ejournal >Investigation and technical comparison of new and conventional wheat combines performance for improvement and modification
【24h】

Investigation and technical comparison of new and conventional wheat combines performance for improvement and modification

机译:新小麦和常规小麦的研究和技术比较结合了改良和改良的性能

获取原文
           

摘要

Wheat is one of the most important food staff in consumption pattern of each country. More than 50% of human energy is supplied from bread in developing countries. Reducing of losses and waists in combine harvesting resulte increasing considerable wheat production in country. Combine loss is less than 2%-3% in developed countries, while that of developing countries is about 15%-20% in different regions and circumstances of harvesting seasons and field conditions. Regarding to research finding that maximum total combine losses are related to combine header loss, so it is necessary to determine precise losses and their causes to improve and modify existing combine's technical characteristics. In this national research project that took place in three provinces of Tehran, Khorasan and Fars, effect of combine type and drum speed to grain losses and waists were investigated. Experimental design was split plot in a completely randomized block design with three replications. Duncan's test was used to statistical analysis of the means. Combine type in four levels of New Holland TC 56, JD 1165, JD 955 and CLASS 68 as a main-plot and drum speed in three levels of 650, 750 and 850 rpm as a sub-plot. Field experiments were carried out in the farmers field with two ha area. Different parameters and factors of each treatment were measured: 1. Pre-harvest loss, 2. Header loss, 3. Drum loss, 4. Cleaning loss, 5. Ground speed & combine field capacity, 6. Drum speed, 7. Linear drum speed, 8. Grain moisture content, 9. Cutting height. The results of Tehran province show that New Holland TC 56 and JD 955 with 1.98% and 2.15% of the total combine losses are the lowest and positioned in class a while JD 1165 and CLASS 68 with 4.29% and 4.12% located in class b. Also New Holland TC 560 has a highest combine capacity of 5187 kg/hr and gets a class of a while JD 1165 while CLASS 68 are in class b and JD 955 is in class c. The results of Fars province show that the highest total combine loss was related to JD 955 and Class 68, 2.72% and 2.84%, respectively, and JD 1165 had the lowest total combine loss (1.61%). The results of Khorasan province show that New Holland TC 56 had a lowest total combine loss (14.3 kg/ha) and got class a and JD 955, JD 1165 and CLASS 68 took class b, c and d, respectively. Also New Holland TC 56 had a highest combine capacity (5,383.58 kg/hr) while CLASS 68, JD 955 and JD 1165 positioned in b, c and d classes, respectively. Therefore, combines improvements and modifications are suggested as 1. Uniform cutting height, 2. compatible reel and ground speed, 3. using effective cutting width, 4. using proper drum speed, 5. choosing proper ground speed regarding crop density.
机译:在每个国家的消费模式中,小麦是最重要的粮食工作人员之一。在发展中国家,超过50%的人类能量来自面包。减少联合收割机的损失和腰围,使该国的小麦产量大大提高。发达国家的联合收割损失少于2%-3%,而在不同地区和收获季节和田间条件的情况下,发展中国家的联合收割损失约为15%-20%。关于研究发现最大的联合收割机总损失与联合收割机的割头损失有关,因此有必要确定精确的损失及其原因,以改善和修改现有联合收割机的技术特性。在这个在德黑兰,霍拉桑和法尔斯三个省进行的国家研究项目中,研究了联合收割机的类型和滚筒速度对谷物损失和腰部的影响。实验设计是在三个重复的完全随机区组设计中的分割图。邓肯检验用于该方法的统计分析。将四种类型的New Holland TC 56,JD 1165,JD 955和CLASS 68组合在一起作为主图,将鼓速度分别以650、750和850 rpm的三种水平作为子图。在面积为2公顷的农民田间进行了田间试验。测量了每种处理的不同参数和因素:1.收获前损失,2.割台损失,3.滚筒损失,4.清洁损失,5.地面速度和联合收割能力,6.滚筒速度,7.线性滚筒速度,8.谷物水分,9.切割高度。德黑兰省的调查结果显示,新荷兰TC 56和JD 955的总损失为1.98%和2.15%,是最低的,排在A级,而JD 1165和CLASS 68的损失为4.29%和4.12%在B类。另外,New Holland TC 560的最高联合收割能力为5187 kg / hr,获得了一段时间的JD 1165等级,而CLASS 68属于b级,而JD 955属于c级。 Fars省的结果表明,最高的联合收割机总损失与JD 955和68类有关,分别为2.72%和2.84%,而JD 1165的最低联合收割机总损失(1.61%)。霍拉桑省的调查结果表明,New Holland TC 56的联合收割机总损失最低(14.3 kg / ha),等级为A级,JD 955,JD 1165和CLASS 68分别为b,c和d级。另外,New Holland TC 56的联合收割能力最高(5383.58 kg / hr),而CLASS 68,JD 955和JD 1165分别位于b,c和d类。因此,建议结合以下方面进行改进和修改:1.统一的切割高度; 2.兼容的卷轴和地面速度; 3.使用有效的切割宽度; 4.使用适当的滚筒速度; 5.选择关于作物密度的适当地面速度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号