首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Ejournal >Studies on Effect of Electrostatic Spraying in Orchards
【24h】

Studies on Effect of Electrostatic Spraying in Orchards

机译:果园静电喷涂效果研究

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Evaluation of an electrostatic sprayer (Make ESS, USA) was conducted on a pear orchard planted at 2.5 m row spacing and distance between plant to plant was 1.5 m. The water sensitive paper stripes were placed on each test plant at the upper and underside of the leaves at the different heights of the plant. Effect of charging on droplet density, area covered by droplets, volume of spray deposition, uniformity coefficient and droplet size were observed during the evaluation of the electrostatic sprayer and comparison was made between two different types of nozzle i.e. twin and single nozzle. It was found that droplet density on the upper and under sides of leaves by twin nozzle (Charged) was significantly (p = 0.0005) higher than twin nozzle (Uncharged) by 57.53 and 59.60% respectively. Droplet density on the upper and underside of leaves by single nozzle (Charged) was significantly (p = 0.0011) higher than single nozzle (Uncharged) by 58.15 and 54.65% respectively. The maximum droplets, i.e. 45 numbers were of size 44 microns observed for the twin nozzle (Charged). But in case of twin nozzle (Uncharged), the maximum droplets, i.e. only 13 numbers of drops were of 44 microns. Similarly maximum droplets, i.e. 32 numbers were of size 44 microns observed for the single nozzle (Charged) and in case of single nozzle (Uncharged), the maximum droplets, i.e. only 11 numbers of drops were of 44 microns. Area covered by droplets on the upper and under sides of leaves by twin nozzle (Charged) was significantly (p = 0.0017) higher than twin nozzle (Uncharged) by 50.19 and 67.86% respectively. Area covered by droplets on the upper and under sides of leaves by single nozzle (Charged) was significantly (p = 0.0007) higher than single nozzle (Uncharged) by 45.07 and 67.53% respectively. Volume of spray deposition on the upper and underside of leaves by twin nozzle was not significantly different single nozzle. Overall results showed that charging of nozzles has increased spraying efficiency significantly than the spraying done by uncharged nozzles for orchards.
机译:对以2.5 m行距种植的梨园和植株间距离为1.5 m的梨园进行了静电喷雾器(美国Make ESS)评估。将水敏纸条放在植物的不同高度处的叶片的上侧和下侧的每个测试植物上。在评价静电喷雾器的过程中,观察到带电对液滴密度,液滴覆盖面积,喷雾沉积量,均匀性系数和液滴尺寸的影响,并比较了两种不同类型的喷嘴,即双喷嘴和单喷嘴。结果发现,双喷嘴(带电)在叶片上侧和下侧的液滴密度显着(p = 0.0005)比双喷嘴(不带电)高57.53%和59.60%。单喷嘴(带电)在叶片上和下侧的液滴密度分别比单喷嘴(不带电)显着(p = 0.0011)高58.15和54.65%。对于双喷嘴(带电),观察到最大液滴,即45个液滴,尺寸为44微米。但是在双喷嘴(不带电)的情况下,最大液滴(即只有13个液滴)为44微米。类似地,对于单个喷嘴(已充电)观察到的最大液滴(即32个)的大小为44微米,在单个喷嘴(未充电)的情况下,最大液滴(即只有11个液滴)为44微米。双喷嘴(带电)在叶子的上侧和下侧的液滴覆盖的面积分别显着(p = 0.0017)比双喷嘴(不带电)高50.19和67.86%。单喷嘴(带电)在叶子的上侧和下侧的液滴覆盖的面积分别显着(p = 0.0007)比单喷嘴(不带电)高45.07%和67.53%。双喷嘴在叶片上部和下部的喷雾沉积量与单喷嘴无显着差异。总体结果表明,与未充电的果园喷嘴相比,喷嘴的装填提高了喷雾效率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号