首页> 外文期刊>AERA Open >Have Gender Gaps in Math Closed? Achievement, Teacher Perceptions, and Learning Behaviors Across Two ECLS-K Cohorts:
【24h】

Have Gender Gaps in Math Closed? Achievement, Teacher Perceptions, and Learning Behaviors Across Two ECLS-K Cohorts:

机译:数学上的性别差距是否已消除?在两个ECLS-K队列中的成就,教师的认知和学习行为:

获取原文
           

摘要

Studies using data from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Studya??Kindergarten Class of 1998a??1999 (ECLS-K:1999) revealed gender gaps in mathematics achievement and teacher perceptions. However, recent evidence suggests that gender gaps have closed on state tests, raising the question of whether such gaps are absent in the ECLS-K:2011 cohort. Extending earlier analyses, this study compares the two ECLS-K cohorts, exploring gaps throughout the achievement distribution and examining whether learning behaviors might differentially explain gaps more at the bottom than the top of the distribution. Overall, this study reveals remarkable consistency across both ECLS-K cohorts, with the gender gap developing early among high achievers and spreading quickly throughout the distribution. Teachers consistently rate girlsa?? mathematical proficiency lower than that of boys with similar achievement and learning behaviors. Gender differences in learning approaches appear to be fairly consistent across the achievement distribution, but girlsa?? more studious approaches appear to have more payoff at the bottom of the distribution than at the top. Questions remain regarding why boys outperform girls at the top of the distribution, and several hypotheses are discussed. Overall, the persistent ECLS-K patterns make clear that girlsa?? early mathematics learning experiences merit further attention.
机译:使用来自1998年早期儿童纵向研究a –幼儿园班-1999(ECLS-K:1999)的数据进行的研究表明,数学成绩和教师认知方面存在性别差距。但是,最近的证据表明,在国家测试中,性别差距已经缩小,这引发了以下问题:在ECLS-K:2011队列中是否没有这种差距。在扩展早期分析的基础上,本研究比较了两个ECLS-K队列,探索了成就分配中的差距,并研究了学习行为是否可能以差异的方式解释了差距的底部而不是顶部。总体而言,这项研究揭示了两个ECLS-K队列之间的显着一致性,性别差异在高成就者中较早发展,并在整个分布中迅速蔓延。老师们对女孩的评价始终如一?数学水平低于具有类似成就和学习行为的男孩。学习方法中的性别差异似乎在成就分配中相当一致,但是女孩a?勤奋好学的方法似乎在分配的底部比顶部分配的收益更多。关于为什么男孩在表现最强的情况下胜过女孩的问题仍然存在,并讨论了一些假设。总体而言,持久的ECLS-K模式清楚地表明girla ??早期的数学学习经验值得进一步关注。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号