首页> 外文期刊>Addiction Science & Clinical Practice >Inconsistencies between alcohol screening results based on AUDIT-C scores and reported drinking on the AUDIT-C questions: prevalence in two US national samples
【24h】

Inconsistencies between alcohol screening results based on AUDIT-C scores and reported drinking on the AUDIT-C questions: prevalence in two US national samples

机译:基于AUDIT-C分数的酒精筛查结果与报告的AUDIT-C问题饮酒之间的不一致:两个美国国家样本中的患病率

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The AUDIT-C is an extensively validated screen for unhealthy alcohol use (i.e. drinking above recommended limits or alcohol use disorder), which consists of three questions about alcohol consumption. AUDIT-C scores ≥4 points for men and ≥3 for women are considered positive screens based on US validation studies that compared the AUDIT-C to “gold standard” measures of unhealthy alcohol use from independent, detailed interviews. However, results of screening—positive or negative based on AUDIT-C scores—can be inconsistent with reported drinking on the AUDIT-C questions. For example, individuals can screen positive based on the AUDIT-C score while reporting drinking below US recommended limits on the same AUDIT-C. Alternatively, they can screen negative based on the AUDIT-C score while reporting drinking above US recommended limits. Such inconsistencies could complicate interpretation of screening results, but it is unclear how often they occur in practice. Methods This study used AUDIT-C data from respondents who reported past-year drinking on one of two national US surveys: a general population survey (N?=?26,610) and a Veterans Health Administration (VA) outpatient survey (N?=?467,416). Gender-stratified analyses estimated the prevalence of AUDIT-C screen results—positive or negative screens based on the AUDIT-C score—that were inconsistent with reported drinking (above or below US recommended limits) on the same AUDIT-C. Results Among men who reported drinking, 13.8% and 21.1% of US general population and VA samples, respectively, had screening results based on AUDIT-C scores (positive or negative) that were inconsistent with reported drinking on the AUDIT-C questions (above or below US recommended limits). Among women who reported drinking, 18.3% and 20.7% of US general population and VA samples, respectively, had screening results that were inconsistent with reported drinking. Limitations This study did not include an independent interview gold standard for unhealthy alcohol use and therefore cannot address how often observed inconsistencies represent false positive or negative screens. Conclusions Up to 21% of people who drink alcohol had alcohol screening results based on the AUDIT-C score that were inconsistent with reported drinking on the same AUDIT-C. This needs to be addressed when training clinicians to use the AUDIT-C.
机译:背景技术AUDIT-C是经过广泛验证的不健康饮酒(即,饮酒量超过建议的限值或饮酒障碍)的屏幕,其中包括三个与饮酒有关的问题。根据美国的验证研究,将AUDIT-C分数≥4分的男性和女性≥3分的女性视为阳性筛查,该研究将AUDIT-C与“黄金标准”的不健康饮酒量度进行了独立,详细的访谈,并进行了比较。但是,筛查的结果(基于AUDIT-C分数的阳性或阴性)可能与所报告的AUDIT-C问题的饮酒不一致。例如,人们可以根据AUDIT-C分数筛查阳性,同时报告饮酒低于同一AUDIT-C的美国建议限值。或者,他们可以根据AUDIT-C分数筛查阴性,同时报告饮酒量超过美国建议的限值。这种不一致可能会使筛查结果的解释复杂化,但目前尚不清楚它们在实践中发生的频率。方法:本研究使用了来自受访者的AUDIT-C数据,这些受访者通过两项美国国家调查中的一项报告了去年的饮酒情况:普通人群调查(N?=?26,610)和退伍军人健康管理局(VA)门诊调查(N?=? 467,416)。性别分层分析估计了AUDIT-C筛查结果(基于AUDIT-C评分的阳性筛查或阴性筛查)的普遍性,这些筛查结果与同一AUDIT-C上报的饮酒(高于或低于美国建议限值)不一致。结果在报告饮酒的男性中,分别有13.8%和21.1%的美国普通人群和VA样本根据AUDIT-C评分(阳性或阴性)进行筛查,结果与报告的AUDIT-C问题上的饮酒不一致(以上)或低于美国建议的限制)。在报告喝酒的女性中,分别有18.3%和20.7%的美国普通人群和VA样本筛查结果与报告的饮酒不一致。局限性本研究未包括针对不健康饮酒的独立访谈黄金标准,因此无法解决观察到的不一致代表假阳性或阴性筛查的频率。结论多达21%的饮酒人群根据AUDIT-C评分进行酒精筛查,结果与报告的同一AUDIT-C饮酒不一致。在培训临床医生使用AUDIT-C时,必须解决此问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号