首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Addiction Science Clinical Practice >Inconsistencies between alcohol screening results based on AUDIT-C scores and reported drinking on the AUDIT-C questions: prevalence in two US national samples
【2h】

Inconsistencies between alcohol screening results based on AUDIT-C scores and reported drinking on the AUDIT-C questions: prevalence in two US national samples

机译:根据AUDIT-C分数进行酒精筛查的结果与根据AUDIT-C问题报告的饮酒之间存在不一致:美国两个国家样本中的患病率

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundThe AUDIT-C is an extensively validated screen for unhealthy alcohol use (i.e. drinking above recommended limits or alcohol use disorder), which consists of three questions about alcohol consumption. AUDIT-C scores ≥4 points for men and ≥3 for women are considered positive screens based on US validation studies that compared the AUDIT-C to “gold standard” measures of unhealthy alcohol use from independent, detailed interviews. However, results of screening—positive or negative based on AUDIT-C scores—can be inconsistent with reported drinking on the AUDIT-C questions. For example, individuals can screen positive based on the AUDIT-C score while reporting drinking below US recommended limits on the same AUDIT-C. Alternatively, they can screen negative based on the AUDIT-C score while reporting drinking above US recommended limits. Such inconsistencies could complicate interpretation of screening results, but it is unclear how often they occur in practice.
机译:背景AUDIT-C是经过广泛验证的不健康饮酒(即超过建议限值饮酒或饮酒障碍)的屏幕,其中包括三个与饮酒有关的问题。根据美国的验证研究,男性的AUDIT-C得分≥4分,女性的≥3分被认为是阳性筛查,该研究通过独立,详细的访谈将AUDIT-C与不健康饮酒的“黄金标准”措施进行了比较。但是,筛查的结果(基于AUDIT-C评分为阳性或阴性)可能与所报告的针对AUDIT-C问题的饮酒不一致。例如,个人可以根据AUDIT-C分数筛查阳性,同时报告饮酒低于同一AUDIT-C的美国建议限值。或者,他们可以根据AUDIT-C分数筛查阴性,同时报告饮酒量超过美国建议的限值。这种不一致可能会使筛查结果的解释复杂化,但目前尚不清楚它们在实践中发生的频率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号