首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Infectious Diseases >Linezolid versus Vancomycin for the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Hospital-Acquired, Ventilator-Associated, and Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia at Tertiary Care Hospital
【24h】

Linezolid versus Vancomycin for the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Hospital-Acquired, Ventilator-Associated, and Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia at Tertiary Care Hospital

机译:利奈唑胺与万古霉素在医院获得性,呼吸机相关性和医疗保健相关性肺炎中对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的治疗

获取原文
           

摘要

Aim: To evaluate morbidity and mortality rate, clinical cure rate and cost of linezolid versus vancomycin in patients who have hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) or Healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP) caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Methods: Retrospective analysis data. Data were collected for adult patients admitted to King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre-Jeddah (KFSH & RC-J) from January 2010 to May 2015. Method: A total of 88 patients with HAP, VAP and HCAP caused by MRSA treated with vancomycin (IV) or linezolid (IV or PO) either as empirically or directed therapy ≥ 7 days. They are retrospectively evaluated and analyzed. The primary end points are morbidity and mortality rate as well as clinical cure rate. The secondary end point is the cost analysis for each medication. Results: A total of 40 patients (ICU, n = 13 (32.5% and non ICU, n = 27 (67.5%)) were included in the study. Among vancomycin, n = 21 (52.5%); age (54.95 ± 18.255) and linezolid, n = 19 (74.5%); age (48.684 ± 25.593), there was no statistical differences in mortality and morbidity rate (P = 0.375). Clinical cure rate (fever improvement, 12 (57.1%) vs 12 (63.2%); P = 0.698, leukocytosis improvement, 15 (71.4%) vs 14 (73.7%); P = 0.873, purulent sputum improvement, 6 (28.6%) vs 4 (21.1%); P = 0.429, dyspnea improvement, 8 (38.1%) vs 3 (15.8%); P = 0.115,cough improvement 4 (19.0%) vs 4 (21.1%); P = 0.592, microbiological eradication of MRSA from sputum culture, 2 (9.5%) vs 6 (31.6%); P = 0.089 and improvement of radiographic finding (pulmonary infiltration), 17 (81.0%) vs 16 (84.2%); P = 0.559) of vancomycin vs linezolid, respectively. The cost analysis in the treatment of MRSA pneumonia with linezolid is statistical significantly higher than vancomycin. The mean cost of vancomycin = 185.9143 SR and of linezolid = 4547.3684 SR (P Conclusion: There are no statistical differences in mortality and morbidity rate and clinical cure rate between linezolid and vancomycin in the treatment of MRSA in HAP, VAP, and HCAP. However, the cost of linezlid is significantly higher than vancomycin during the treatment period of one patient.
机译:目的:评估耐甲氧西林引起的医院获得性肺炎(HAP),呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)或医疗保健相关性肺炎(HCAP)的患者中利奈唑胺和万古霉素的发病率和死亡率,临床治愈率和成本金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)。方法:回顾性分析数据。收集2010年1月至2015年5月在吉达国王费萨尔专科医院和研究中心(KFSH&RC-J)住院的成年患者的数据。方法:万古霉素治疗的MRSA导致88例HAP,VAP和HCAP患者(IV)或利奈唑胺(IV或PO)经验或定向治疗≥7天。对其进行回顾性评估和分析。主要终点是发病率,死亡率以及临床治愈率。次要终点是每种药物的成本分析。结果:共纳入40例患者(ICU,n = 13(32.5%,非ICU,n = 27(67.5%));万古霉素,n = 21(52.5%);年龄(54.95±18.255) )和利奈唑胺(n = 19(74.5%);年龄(48.684±25.593)),死亡率和发病率无统计学差异(P = 0.375)。临床治愈率(发烧改善率为12(57.1%)vs 12( 63.2%); P = 0.698,白细胞增多,15(71.4%)比14(73.7%); P = 0.873,化脓性痰,6(28.6%)vs 4(21.1%); P = 0.429,呼吸困难, 8(38.1%)vs 3(15.8%); P = 0.115,咳嗽改善4(19.0%)vs 4(21.1%); P = 0.592,痰培养中MRSA的微生物根除,2(9.5%)vs 6( 31.6%); P = 0.089和影像学发现(肺部浸润)的改善,万古霉素和利奈唑胺分别为17(81.0%)比16(84.2%); P = 0.559)。利奈唑胺在统计学上显着高于万古霉素,平均成本为185 .9143 SR和利奈唑胺= 4547.3684 SR(P结论:利奈唑胺和万古霉素在HAP,VAP和HCAP中治疗MRSA的死亡率,发病率和临床治愈率无统计学差异。然而,在一名患者的治疗期间,利奈唑酮的费用明显高于万古霉素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号