首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Mechanical Engineering >Comparing the efficiency and robustness of state-of-the-art experimental designs for stated choice modeling: A simulation analysis:
【24h】

Comparing the efficiency and robustness of state-of-the-art experimental designs for stated choice modeling: A simulation analysis:

机译:比较用于陈述选择建模的最新实验设计的效率和鲁棒性:仿真分析:

获取原文
           

摘要

Among the ways to construct experimental designs having been proposed, orthogonal design, uniform design, and D-efficient design are state-of-the-art methods. This article provides detailed comparisons on the efficiency and robustness among these methods with three case studies in multinomial logit and mixed multinomial logit models. ND-error values and the departures of D-errors corresponding to misspecification of prior information are used as measurements of design efficiency and design robustness, respectively. Design methods are described, and designs with various numbers of runs are constructed. The results indicate that (a) when parameter priors are available, D-efficient design method outperforms the other two methods, in terms of design efficiency, while uniform design and orthogonal design methods are comparable with each other; (b) there will be efficiency loss when D-efficient design that constructed for specific model is implemented in other ones; (c) all three methods have comparable robustn...
机译:在已经提出的构造实验设计的方法中,正交设计,统一设计和D有效设计是最先进的方法。本文通过在多项logit模型和混合多项logit模型中的三个案例研究,对这些方法的效率和鲁棒性进行了详细的比较。 ND误差值和对应于先验信息的错误指定的D误差的偏离分别用作设计效率和设计稳健性的度量。描述了设计方法,并构造了具有各种运行次数的设计。结果表明:(a)当参数先验可用时,D效率设计方法在设计效率方面优于其他两种方法,而统一设计方法和正交设计方法可以相互比较; (b)在其他模型中实施针对特定模型构建的D效率设计时,会造成效率损失; (c)三种方法都具有可比的鲁棒性...

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号