首页> 外文期刊>Acta Stomatologica Croatica >Clinical Analysis of Compomer Restorations in Primary Dentition: 2-Year Evaluation
【24h】

Clinical Analysis of Compomer Restorations in Primary Dentition: 2-Year Evaluation

机译:原发性牙合体修复的临床分析:2年评估

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Various materials are available as alternatives to amalgam for restorations in primary teeth. The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical performance of two compomers: Hytac and Compoglass in class II restorations in primary teeth, as an alternative to amalgam. Seventynin second class cavities (60 patients) in primary molars were restored with amalgam (Vivadent/Ivoclar, Schaan, Liechtenstein, LOT 819798) (24 restorations), Compoglass (Vivadent/Ivoclar, Schaan, Liechtenstein LOT 819798) (24 restorations) and Hytac (3M Espe, Seefeld, Germany LOT 012) (26 restorations). Each material was placed by using the respective adhesive system in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Restorations were evaluated immediately after placement and after 6 months, one year and two years by using modified USPHS (Ryge & Cvar) criteria. After two years colour evaluation rate A was recorded in 79% of cases with compomer restorations with Compoglass and 80% for compomer restorations with Hytac. Marginal adaptation for amalgam restorations was evaluated as rate A in 62.5%, rate B in 33.3% and rate D in 4.2%, while for compomer restorations with Compoglass rate A was recorded in 50%, rate B in 37.5% and rate D in 12.5%. Compomer restorations with Hytac were evaluated as rate A in 48%, rate B in 36% and rate D in 16%. Changes in marginal discoloration for amalgam restorations were evaluated as rate A in 79.2%, rate B in 16.7% and rate C in 4.2%. Compomer restorations with Compoglass were evaluated as rate A in 70.8%, rate B in 12.5% and rate C in 16.7%, while the results for compomer restorations with Hytac were rate A in 60%, rate B in 24% and rate C in 16% of cases. Statistical analysis was performed by means of nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests, which did not show statistically significant difference for the materials, according to the criteria used. Both evaluated compomer materials can be used as alternatives to amalgam restorations in clinical work. However, longer clinical testing is needed in order to obtain relevant results.
机译:各种材料可以替代汞齐,用于乳牙的修复。该研究的目的是评估两种复合物:Hytac和Compoglass在乳牙II类修复中作为汞合金的替代品的临床表现。用银汞合金(Vivadent / Ivoclar,Schaan,列支敦士登,LOT 819798)(24个修复体),Compoglass(Vivadent / Ivoclar,Schaan,列支敦士登LOT 819798)(24个修复体)和Hytac修复原发性磨牙中的79例二等腔(60例患者)。 (3M Espe,Seefeld,德国LOT 012)(26修复)。每种材料均按照制造商的说明使用相应的粘合剂系统放置。使用修改后的USPHS(Ryge&Cvar)标准,在放置后以及六个月,一年和两年后立即评估修复情况。两年后,在79%的Compoglass修复体和80%的Hytac修复体中记录了颜色评估率A。汞合金修复体的边缘适应性评估为:A率为62.5%,B率为33.3%,D为4.2%,而Compoglass修复的复合体修复率A为50%,B为37.5%,D为12.5。 %。用Hytac修复的复合物修复体的评估率为A:48%,B:36%,D:16%。汞合金修复体边缘变色的变化评估为A率为79.2%,B率为16.7%,C率为4.2%。使用Compoglass进行复合体修复的评估为A率为70.8%,B为12.5%,C为16.7%,而使用Hytac进行复合体修复的结果为A为60%,B为24%,C为16 %的情况。通过非参数Kruskal-Wallis和Mann-Whitney检验进行统计分析,根据使用的标准,这些检验未显示出材料的统计学差异。两种经过评估的复合材料均可在临床工作中用作汞齐修复的替代方法。但是,需要更长的临床测试以获得相关结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号