首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Bioscience and Clinical Medicine >Evaluation the Difference between Results of MRI and Electrodiagnostic Methods in Inferior Lumbosacral Discopathies
【24h】

Evaluation the Difference between Results of MRI and Electrodiagnostic Methods in Inferior Lumbosacral Discopathies

机译:评价下腰Results部不适的MRI结果与电诊断方法之间的差异

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: To achieve an appropriate treatment for low back pain we should know the exact reason of the pain. Beside physical examination, imaging modalities like CT scan and MRI are the other diagnostic methods for LBP. Furthermore, electrodiagnostic studies help to diagnose the reason behind radiculopathy. Actually when the reason of radiculopathy is unclear, these methods help to localize the exact nerve root causing the pain and rule out the similar reasons of radiculopathy. The aim of this study was to compare MRI and EMG in diagnosing the reason of lumbosacral radiculopathies. Methods: In this cross sectional descriptive-analytical study, the number of patients who came to neurosurgery clinics with LBP and lumbar discopathy and been evaluated by MRI and EMG were studied. Later, for every patient a questionnaire was completed based on the results achieved from MRI and EMG and the obtained results were compared. Results: 100 patients were participated in this study, 60% female and 40% male. The average age of patients was 39/75 years. The most frequent chief complaint of patients was LBP with a prevalence of 43%. MRI findings showed 64% involvement of L4/L5 level in these patients. On the other hand, EMG findings also showed L4/L5 level involvement in 64% of patients confirming the hypothesis of our study that MRI and EMG findings are compatible with each other in determining the level and intensity of disc involvement. Conclusion: For determining the level of injury in lumbosacral radiculopathies, both MRI and EMG are equally useful. Additionally, in borderline cases we can use EMG to confirm MRI findings to determine the intensity and level of injury.
机译:简介:为了获得适当的腰痛治疗方法,我们应该知道疼痛的确切原因。除体格检查外,CT扫描和MRI等成像方式是LBP的其他诊断方法。此外,电诊断研究有助于诊断神经根病的原因。实际上,当尚不清楚神经根病的原因时,这些方法有助于定位引起疼痛的确切神经根,并排除类似的神经根病原因。这项研究的目的是比较MRI和EMG在诊断腰s神经根病变的原因。方法:在该横断面描述性分析研究中,研究了来过LBP和腰椎间盘突出症的神经外科门诊并通过MRI和EMG评估的患者人数。之后,根据MRI和EMG获得的结果,为每位患者填写一份调查表,并对获得的结果进行比较。结果:100名患者参加了这项研究,女性为60%,男性为40%。患者的平均年龄为39/75岁。患者最主要的主诉是LBP,患病率为43%。 MRI检查显示这些患者中L4 / L5水平受累64%。另一方面,EMG的发现也显示64%的患者L4 / L5水平受累,这证实了我们的研究假设MRI和EMG的发现在确定椎间盘受累的水平和强度方面相互兼容。结论:对于确定腰s神经根病变的损伤程度,MRI和EMG都是同等有用的。此外,在边缘情况下,我们可以使用EMG确认MRI表现以确定损伤的强度和水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号