首页> 外文期刊>Advanced Biomedical Research >Efficacy of topical azathioprine and betamethasone versus betamethasone-only emollient cream in 2-18 years old patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: A randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Efficacy of topical azathioprine and betamethasone versus betamethasone-only emollient cream in 2-18 years old patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: A randomized controlled trial

机译:局部硫唑嘌呤和倍他米松与仅倍他米松润肤霜在2-18岁中度至重度特应性皮炎患者中的疗效:一项随机对照试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Atopic dermatitis is a chronic skin disease with increasing prevalence worldwide and a considerable burden especially among children. To circumvent the problems related to oral azathioprine (AZT) we aimed to evaluate its topical variant and assess its efficacy in patients aged 2-18. Materials and Methods: In a single-blind trial, we randomized the patients into two groups, one treated with topical emollient containing AZT and betamethasone (BM), and the other treated solely with topical emollient of BM. The treatments were administered twice a day for 8 weeks in both groups. The efficacy, recurrence, and the presence of side effects were evaluated using SPSS 20. Results: The amount of reduction in severity scoring for atopic dermatitis (SCORAD) score was significantly greater in the group treated with the topical AZT ( P = 0.024). Incidentally, there were no difference between two treatments in difference in proportions of recurrence and adverse effects as well as SCORAD reduction in subgroups of sex and age (all P > 0.05). Conclusions: Our results showed the superiority of topical AZT over BM with a low recurrence and adverse effects. No expectation of severe side effects, like those of oral AZT, is the major advantage of topical AZT. The sample size was an issue in uncovering the value of AZT in the subgroups. Conducting prolonged studies of quality-of-life and comparing the topical AZT potency relative to the common alternatives are recommended areas of future work.
机译:背景:特应性皮炎是一种慢性皮肤病,在世界范围内患病率不断上升,尤其是在儿童中负担相当重。为了避免与口服硫唑嘌呤(AZT)有关的问题,我们旨在评估其局部用药变体,并评估其在2-18岁患者中的疗效。材料和方法:在一项单盲试验中,我们将患者分为两组,一组接受含AZT和倍他米松(BM)的局部润肤剂治疗,另一组仅接受BM局部润肤剂治疗。两组每天进行两次治疗,共8周。使用SPSS 20评估疗效,复发率和副作用的存在。结果:局部AZT治疗组的特应性皮炎(SCORAD)评分严重程度得分的降低幅度明显更大(P = 0.024)。顺便说一句,两种治疗在性别和年龄亚组的复发和不良反应比例以及SCORAD降低方面没有差异(所有P> 0.05)。结论:我们的结果显示局部AZT优于BM,具有较低的复发率和不良反应。像口服AZT一样,没有预期的严重副作用是局部AZT的主要优势。样本量是揭示亚组中AZT值的一个问题。建议对生活质量进行长期研究,并将局部AZT药效相对于常见替代品进行比较,这是未来工作的推荐领域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号