首页> 外文期刊>Acta medica Iranica. >Comparison of Oral Midazolam With Intravenous Midazolam for Sedation Children During Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
【24h】

Comparison of Oral Midazolam With Intravenous Midazolam for Sedation Children During Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

机译:上消化道内窥镜检查镇静儿童口服咪达唑仑与静脉使用咪达唑仑的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Upper endoscopy is a common procedure for the diagnosis and treatment of upper digestive tract diseases. The increasing number of pediatric gastrointestinal procedures has led to increasing attention on the safety and efficacy of medications used for sedation during the procedure. This randomized blinded interventional study was designed to compare the effect of oral midazolam with intravenous (IV) midazolam as a sedative medication in 119 children undergoing endoscopy. The mean time to sedation was 2.2±0.7 in IV midazolam group and 30.9±0 in oral midazolam group which was statistically significant difference between two groups. Separation from parents in oral midazolam group was as follow: 2 patients were high resistant (3.5%), 2 patients were resisted first and then relaxed (3.5%) and 55 patients were separated from their parents without any resistance (93%); whereas in IV midazolam group, 8 patients were high resistant (13.3%), 29 patients were relatively resistant (48.3%) and 23 patients were separated from their parents without any resistance (38.3%) that shows significant differences between the two groups. In terms of patient comfort during endoscopy, there was also a significant difference between the two groups. In oral midazolam, group parents were more consent, compared with the other group. The present study showed that oral midazolam is a safe and effective sedation during upper endoscopy in pediatrics. Oral midazolam reducing patients' anxiety during separation from parents leads the easy use of endoscopy and comfort of patients during endoscopy as compared with IV midazolam. Oral or IV midazolam were not able to put most patients in deep sedation level.
机译:上内镜检查是诊断和治疗上消化道疾病的常用方法。小儿胃肠道手术的数量不断增加,导致人们对该手术期间用于镇静的药物的安全性和有效性越来越关注。这项随机双盲干预性研究旨在比较口服咪达唑仑和静脉使用咪达唑仑作为镇静药物在119例接受内窥镜检查的儿童中的作用。静脉使用咪达唑仑组的平均镇静时间为2.2±0.7,口服咪达唑仑组的平均镇静时间为30.9±0,两组之间有统计学意义的差异。口服咪达唑仑组与父母的分离如下:2例有高抵抗力(3.5%),2例先被抵抗然后放松(3.5%),55例父母分离而没有任何抵抗力(93%); IV咪达唑仑组有8例高耐药(13.3%),29例相对耐药(48.3%)和23例父母分离而没有任何耐药(38.3%),这两组之间存在显着差异。就内窥镜检查期间的患者舒适度而言,两组之间也存在显着差异。与另一组相比,口服咪达唑仑组的父母更同意。本研究表明,口服咪达唑仑在儿科上消化道镜检查期间是一种安全有效的镇静剂。与静脉使用咪达唑仑相比,口服咪达唑仑减少了与父母分离时患者的焦虑,使内窥镜检查变得容易使用,并使内窥镜检查患者感到舒适。口服或静脉注射咪达唑仑不能使大多数患者处于深度镇静状态。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号