首页> 外文期刊>Acta orthopaedica. >Hip-inspired implant for revision of failed reverse shoulder arthroplasty with severe glenoid bone loss Improved clinical outcome in 11 patients at 3-year follow-up
【24h】

Hip-inspired implant for revision of failed reverse shoulder arthroplasty with severe glenoid bone loss Improved clinical outcome in 11 patients at 3-year follow-up

机译:髋关节植入物用于修复失败的肩关节置换术并伴有严重关节盂骨丢失的患者,在3年的随访中改善了11例患者的临床疗效

获取原文
           

摘要

Background and purpose — Glenoid reconstruction and inverted glenoid re-implantation is strongly advocated in revisions of failed reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Nevertheless, severe glenoid deficiency may preclude glenoid reconstruction and may dictate less favorable solutions, such as conversion to hemiarthropasty or resection arthropasty. The CAD/CAM shoulder (Stanmore Implants, Elstree, UK), a hip arthroplasty-inspired implant, may facilitate glenoid component fixation in these challenging revisions where glenoid reconstruction is not feasible. We questioned (1) whether revision arthroplasty with the CAD/CAM shoulder would alleviate pain and improve shoulder function in patients with failed RSA, not amenable to glenoid reconstruction, (2) whether the CAD/CAM hip-inspired glenoid shell would enable secure and durable glenoid component fixation in these challenging revisions. Patients and methods — 11 patients with failed RSAs and unreconstructable glenoids underwent revision with the CAD/CAM shoulder and were followed-up for mean 35 (28–42) months. Clinical outcomes included the Oxford shoulder score, subjective shoulder value, pain rating, physical examination, and shoulder radiographs. Results — The average Oxford shoulder score and subjective shoulder value improved statistically significantly after the revision from 50 to 33 points and from 17% to 48% respectively. Pain rating at rest and during activity improved significantly from 5.3 to 2.3 and from 8.1 to 3.8 respectively. Active forward flexion increased from 25 to 54 degrees and external rotation increased from 9 to 21 degrees. 4 patients required reoperation for postoperative complications. No cases of glenoid loosening occurred. Interpretation — The CAD/CAM shoulder offers an alternative solution for the treatment of failed RSA that is not amenable to glenoid reconstruction.
机译:背景与目的—在失败的反向肩关节置换术(RSA)的修订中,强烈主张进行盂盂重建和反向盂盂再植入。然而,严重的关节盂缺损可能会阻止关节盂重建,并可能要求较不利的解决方案,例如转换为半髋关节置换或切除性关节置换。 CAD / CAM肩部(Stanmore植入物,英国Elstree)是一种髋关节置换术植入物,在这些难以修复的关节盂翻修术中,可能有助于将关节盂部件固定。我们质疑(1)对于RSA失败的患者(不适合进行关节盂重建),CAD / CAM肩关节置换术是否可以减轻疼痛并改善肩部功能,(2)CAD / CAM髋关节启发的关节盂壳是否能够确保安全和在这些具有挑战性的修订版中,经久耐用的关节盂部件固定。患者和方法— 11例RSA失败且无法重建的关节盂的患者接受了CAD / CAM肩关节翻修术,平均随访35(28-42)个月。临床结果包括牛津肩部评分,主观肩部价值,疼痛等级,体格检查和肩部X光片。结果—修订后,牛津的平均肩膀评分和主观肩膀价值从50改善到33,从17%改善到48%。静止和运动期间的疼痛等级分别从5.3到2.3和从8.1到3.8显着提高。主动向前弯曲从25度增加到54度,外旋从9度增加到21度。 4例因术后并发症需要再次手术。没有发生关节盂松弛的病例。解释— CAD / CAM肩部提供了一种失败的RSA治疗方法,该方法不适用于关节盂重建。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号