首页> 外文期刊>Acta Gymnica >Individual differences of sensitivity of tennis players to injustice situations from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality Big Five Theory
【24h】

Individual differences of sensitivity of tennis players to injustice situations from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality Big Five Theory

机译:从人格五项理论的五因素模型看网球运动员对不公正状况敏感性的个体差异

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: The reason why some people reflect an increased incidence of injustice and others are barely able to remember the injustice situation is embedded in the meaning that a person attributes to these situations based on their subjective evaluation. Therefore, in this context, we consider it meaningful to mention Bruner's postulated relationship between the dynamics of personality and the dynamics of perception showing that a discrepancy in the perception of a human being may be explained in the sphere of personality structure. Objective: The study aims to investigate the different level of sensitivity of tennis players towards injustice situations. The variability of sensitivity level against injustice was investigated from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. Methods: The research sample consists of 61 tennis players (33 women, 28 men) aged from 20 to 24 (21.75 ± 1.40 years). The personality structure of tennis players was investigated by the NEO-FFI inventory (Ruisel & Halama, 2007). Their level of sensitivity to injustice was investigated by the questionnaire of sensitivity to injustice - SVN (Lova?, 1995). Results: Tennis players who are highly sensitive to injustice have a high level of emotional lability and those who have a low sensitivity to injustice have a high level of emotional stability (r = .41; p = .001). The results of research have also shown that the level of conscientiousness, agreeableness and openness to experience does not have significant effect on their overall sensitivity to injustice, however, we have found significant relationship in terms of emotional component towards sensitivity to injustice (r = .29; p = .033) in the case of extrovert/introvert. Conclusion: The results of our research have shown that the sensitivity to injustice of tennis players varies according to the level of emotional lability/stability.
机译:背景:有些人反映出不公正现象的发生率增加,而另一些人却几乎不记得不公正状况的原因,在于一个人根据其主观评价将其归因于这些状况的含义。因此,在这种情况下,我们认为有必要提及布鲁纳在人格动力学和知觉动力学之间的假定关系,这表明人的知觉差异可以在人格结构​​领域得到解释。目的:该研究旨在调查网球运动员对不公正状况的不同敏感性水平。从人格因素五因素模型的角度研究了敏感性水平对不公正性的变异性。方法:研究样本包括61位年龄在20至24岁(21.75±1.40岁)的网球运动员(33位女性,28位男性)。通过NEO-FFI清单调查了网球运动员的人格结构(Ruisel&Halama,2007)。他们对不公正的敏感性水平是通过对不公正的敏感性问卷-SVN(Lova ?, 1995)进行调查的。结果:对不公正感高度敏感的网球运动员的情绪不稳定水平较高,而对不公正感敏感度较低的网球运动员的情绪稳定性水平较高(r = .41; p = .001)。研究结果还表明,认真程度,愉悦性和开放经验对他们对不公正的整体敏感性没有显着影响,但是,我们发现在情感成分与对不公正的敏感性方面存在显着关系(r =)。 29; p = .033),外向/内向。结论:我们的研究结果表明,网球运动员对不公正行为的敏感性会根据情绪不稳定/稳定性的水平而变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号