首页> 外文期刊>Acta orthopaedica. >Dual mobility cups in primary total hip arthroplasties: trend over time in use, patient characteristics, and mid-term revision in 3,038 cases in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (2007–2016)
【24h】

Dual mobility cups in primary total hip arthroplasties: trend over time in use, patient characteristics, and mid-term revision in 3,038 cases in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (2007–2016)

机译:初次全髋关节置换术中的双活动杯:使用时间,患者特征和中期翻修的趋势在荷兰人工关节置换登记册中有3,038例(2007-2016年)

获取原文
       

摘要

Background and purpose — We noticed an increased use of dual mobility cups (DMC) in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) despite limited knowledge of implant longevity. Therefore, we determined the trend over time and mid-term cup revision rates of DMC compared with unipolar cups (UC) in primary THA.Patients and methods — All primary THA registered in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI) during 2007–2016 were included (n = 215,953) and divided into 2 groups — DMC THA (n = 3,038) and UC THA (n = 212,915). Crude competing risk and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed with cup revision for any reason as primary endpoint. Adjustments were made for sex, age, diagnosis at primary THA, previous operation, ASA score, type of fixation, surgical approach, and femoral head size.Results — The proportion of primary DMC THA increased from 0.8% (n = 184) in 2010 to 2.6% (n = 740) in 2016. Patients who underwent DMC THA more often had a previous operation on the affected hip, a higher ASA score, and the diagnosis acute fracture or late posttraumatic status compared with the UC THA group. Overall 5-year cup revision rate was 1.5% (95% CI 1.0–2.3) for DMC and 1.4% (CI 1.3–1.4) for UC THA. Stratified analyses for patient characteristics showed no differences in cup revision rates between the 2 groups. Multivariable regression analyses showed no statistically significantly increased risk for revision for DMC THA (HR 0.9 [0.6–1.2]).Interpretation — The use of primary DMC THA increased with differences in patient characteristics. The 5-year cup revision rates for DMC THA and UC THA were comparable.
机译:背景与目的—尽管对植入物的寿命了解有限,但我们注意到在原发性全髋关节置换术(THA)中越来越多地使用双活动杯(DMC)。因此,我们确定了在原发性THA中与单极杯(UC)相比DMC随时间和中期杯修订率的趋势。患者和方法—包括2007–2016年在荷兰人工关节置换术注册(LROI)中注册的所有原发性THA。 (n = 215,953),并分为2组-DMC THA(n = 3,038)和UC THA(n = 212,915)。出于任何原因,以杯校正进行粗竞争风险和多变量Cox回归分析。对性别,年龄,原发性THA的诊断,先前的手术,ASA评分,固定类型,手术入路和股骨头大小进行了调整。结果— 2010年原发性DMC THA的比例从0.8%(n = 184)增加到2016年降至2.6%(n = 740)。与UC THA组相比,接受DMC THA的患者更常在患髋上接受过手术,ASA评分更高,并诊断为急性骨折或创伤后后期。 DMC的总体5年杯翻修率为1.5%(95%CI 1.0-2.3),而UC THA为1.4%(CI 1.3-1.4)。对患者特征的分层分析显示,两组之间的杯翻修率没有差异。多变量回归分析显示,DMC THA修订的风险没有统计学上的显着增加(HR 0.9 [0.6–1.2])。解释—由于患者特征的差异,初次DMC THA的使用增加了。 DMC THA和UC THA的5年杯翻修率相当。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号