首页> 外文期刊>Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica >Distal medial tibial locking plate for fixation of extraarticular distal humeral fractures; an alternative choice for fixation
【24h】

Distal medial tibial locking plate for fixation of extraarticular distal humeral fractures; an alternative choice for fixation

机译:胫骨远端内侧锁定板固定肱骨远端肱骨骨折;固定的另一种选择

获取原文
       

摘要

Objective The aim of this study was to describe an alternative fixation method for distal humeral extra-articular fractures through posterior approach using distal tibia anatomic locking plate; and to evaluate the patient's functional outcome and union condition. Methods Eighteen patients (11 men and 7 women; average age of 37.0?±?17.3 years (range: 18–73 years)) with a distal humeral extra-articular fracture who were treated with distal tibial medial locking plate were included into the study. The mean follow up time was 36.2?±?16.7 (12–57) months. Functional results were evaluated with perception of pain, range of joint motion, grasp and pinch strengths. Results Union was achieved in 17 of 18 patients. Only one patient had non-union due to infection and underwent debridement. The mean time for union was 7.8?±?5.9 months (2–20). Patient perception of pain was X?=?1.88?±?2.50 and X?=?4.55?±?2.68, respectively, at rest and activity. The active ranges of joint motion were adequate for functional use. General functional state of affected extremity (DASH-T) was perfect (X?=?27.14?±?25.66), the performance of elbow joint was good (X?=?84.44?±?11.57). There were no differences in the comparison of grasp and pinch grip of patients with uninvolved extremity (p??0.05). Conclusions In distal humeral extra-articular fractures, use of distal medial tibia plate has advantages such as providing high rates for union, low rates for complication, and early return to work with early rehabilitation, therefore it may be considered a fixation choice that can be used for distal humeral extra-articular fractures. Level of evidence Level IV, therapeutic study.
机译:目的本研究的目的是描述使用胫骨远端解剖锁定板通过后入路进行肱骨远端关节外骨折的另一种固定方法。并评估患者的功能结局和结合状况。方法将18例肱骨远端关节外骨折的患者(11例男性和7例女性,平均年龄37.0±17.3岁,范围:18-73岁)纳入胫骨远端内侧锁定钢板治疗。 。平均随访时间为36.2±16.7(12-57)个月。通过评估疼痛感,关节运动范围,抓握力和捏力来评估功能结果。结果18例患者中有17例达到了联合。仅一名患者因感染并进行了清创术而发生骨不连。工会的平均时间为7.8±5.9个月(2-20)。在休息和活动时,患者对疼痛的感知分别为Xα= 1.88±±2.50和Xα= 4.55±±2.68。关节运动的有效范围足以用于功能用途。患肢的一般功能状态(DASH-T)良好(X≥= 27.14±±25.66),肘关节表现良好(X≥= 84.44±±11.57)。四肢未受累患者的抓握和捏握比较无差异(p≥0.05)。结论在肱骨远端关节外骨折中,使用胫骨远端内侧钢板具有较高的愈合率,较低的并发症发生率以及早期恢复早期康复的优势,因此可以考虑选择一种固定的固定方法。用于肱骨远端关节外骨折。证据级别第四级,治疗研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号