...
首页> 外文期刊>Academic Pathology >A Difficult Challenge for the Clinical Laboratory: Accessing and Interpreting Manufacturer Cross-Reactivity Data for Immunoassays Used in Urine Drug Testing:
【24h】

A Difficult Challenge for the Clinical Laboratory: Accessing and Interpreting Manufacturer Cross-Reactivity Data for Immunoassays Used in Urine Drug Testing:

机译:临床实验室面临的艰巨挑战:获取和解释制造商用于尿液药物检测的免疫分析的交叉反应性数据:

获取原文
           

摘要

Urine drug testing by immunoassay is widely used to detect nonmedical drug use and to monitor patients prescribed controlled substances. A key attribute of urine drug testing immunoassays is cross-reactivity, namely the response of various compounds compared to the target of the assay. In this report, we analyzed the variability in how manufacturer cross-reactivity data are summarized in package inserts for commercially available amphetamines, benzodiazepines, and opiates immunoassays, 3 broad drug classes commonly included in routine drug testing panels. Specifically, we determined the number of compounds tested for cross-reactivity, manner in which cross-reactivity is measured, concentration units used, how often compounds known to be cross-reactive with marketed urine drug testing immunoassays prior to 2010 were tested, availability of the package insert online, and how often cross-reactivity on “designer drugs” was found in the package inserts. There was wide variability in the number of compounds tested (both positive and negative), with the highest number of tested compounds generally found in point-of-care urine drug testing applications. Most package inserts used ng/mL as the concentration units and expressed cross-reactivity in terms of equivalent concentrations to the assay calibrator. Approximately 50% of package inserts were directly available online. Cross-reactivity data were sparse with respect to “off-target” drugs known to be cross-reactive prior to 2010 (an example being quinolone antibiotics and opiates immunoassays) and designer drugs. The present study indicates lack of consistency in cross-reactivity information in package inserts, complicating the interpretation of urine drug testing results. We use 3 example clinical cases to illustrate practical challenges accessing and interpreting cross-reactivity data.
机译:通过免疫测定法进行尿液药物检测被广泛用于检测非医疗药物的使用并监测患者处方的受控物质。尿液药物检测免疫测定的关键属性是交叉反应性,即与测定目标相比,各种化合物的反应。在本报告中,我们分析了在商业可用苯丙胺,苯二氮卓类和鸦片类免疫测定(常规药物测试小组通常包括的3大类药物)的包装说明书中汇总制造商交叉反应性数据的方式中的差异。具体而言,我们确定了用于交叉反应的化合物的数量,测量交叉反应的方式,使用的浓度单位,在2010年之前与市售尿液药物免疫测定法进行交叉反应的已知化合物的测试频率,在线包装插页,以及在包装插页中发现“设计药物”交叉反应的频率。被测化合物的数量(正和负)差异很大,通常在即时尿液药物测试应用中发现的被测化合物数量最多。大多数包装插页使用ng / mL作为浓度单位,并以与测定校准品等效的浓度表示交叉反应性。大约50%的包装插页可直接在线获得。相对于2010年之前已知具有交叉反应性的“脱靶”药物(例如喹诺酮类抗生素和鸦片类免疫测定)和设计药物而言,交叉反应性数据很少。本研究表明包装插页中交叉反应信息的一致性,使尿液药物检测结果的解释变得复杂。我们使用3个示例临床案例来说明访问和解释交叉反应性数据的实际挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号