首页> 外文期刊>Crop science >Sward Structure, Light Interception, and Rhizome-Root Responses of Rhizoma Peanut Cultivars and Germplasm to Grazing Management
【24h】

Sward Structure, Light Interception, and Rhizome-Root Responses of Rhizoma Peanut Cultivars and Germplasm to Grazing Management

机译:根茎花生品种和种质对放牧管理的草地结构,光截留和根茎根响应

获取原文
           

摘要

a€?Florigrazea€? rhizoma peanut (RP; Arachis glabrata Benth.) is a persistent forage legume for the US Gulf Coast, but peanut stunt virus (Cucumovirus spp.) reduces herbage accumulation (HA). Less susceptible germplasms and cultivars of RP have been released, but their responses to grazing management are not known. The objective was to quantify aboveground and belowground sward responses to grazing management of RP entries differing in growth habit to explain HA and persistence. Treatments were all combinations of four RP entries (Florigraze, a€?UF Peacea€?, a€?UF Titoa€?, and germplasm Ecoturf), two grazing intensities (50 and 75% removal of pre-grazing canopy height), and two regrowth intervals (3 or 6 wk). UF Tito swards were the tallest and Ecoturf the shortest, but Ecoturf had greater herbage bulk density than any entry. Pre-grazing leaf percentage was greatest for Ecoturf (61%); there were no differences among the upright entries (56a€“57%). Ecoturf (0.88) and UF Tito (0.76) had greater post-grazing residual leaf area index than Florigraze (0.61). Ecoturf and UF Tito had greater rhizome-root mass (4450 and 4110 kg ha-1, respectively) than Florigraze and UF Peace (3490 and 3170 kg ha-1, respectively). Pre-grazing light interception was greater for the 6- than 3-wk grazing frequency (85 vs. 70%, respectively), and rhizome-root mass followed a similar pattern (3990 vs. 2730 kg ha-1, respectively). Sward structure, leaf, and rhizome-root data explain lack of differences among entries in HA, excellent persistence of Ecoturf and UF Tito, and generally greater HA and persistence for 6- vs. 3-wk regrowth intervals.
机译:a?Florigrazea€?花生根茎(RP; Arachis glabrata Benth。)是美国墨西哥湾沿岸的一种持久性饲用豆类,但是花生特技病毒(Cucumovirus spp。)减少了草料积累(HA)。 RP的较弱种质和栽培品种已被释放,但它们对放牧管理的反应尚不清楚。目的是量化对生长习性不同的RP条目放牧管理的地上和地下草地响应,以解释HA和持久性。处理是以下四个组合的全部组合:Florigraze,UF Peacea,UF Titoa和种质Ecoturf,两个放牧强度(放牧前冠层高度去除了50%和75%),以及两个再生间隔(3或6周)。 UF铁托草皮最高,而草皮最短,但草皮的草密度比其他任何草皮都高。放牧前的叶子百分比对Ecoturf来说最大(61%);直立条目之间没有差异(56a?57%)。 Ecoturf(0.88)和UF Tito(0.76)的放牧后残留叶面积指数大于Florigraze(0.61)。 Ecoturf和UF Tito的根茎质量(分别为4450和4110 kg ha-1)比Florigraze和UF Peace(分别为3490和3170 kg ha-1)更大。 6周到3周的放牧频率对草前采光的拦截作用更大(分别为85%和70%),根茎根质量遵循相似的模式(分别为3990和2730 kg ha-1)。草地结构,叶片和根茎的数据解释了HA中各个条目之间没有差异,Eturturf和UF Tito的持久性极佳,并且通常在6周和3周的再生间隔中具有更高的HA和持久性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号