首页> 外文期刊>Current urology. >Peri-Operative Outcomes after Open and Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy by Using an Advanced Bipolar Seal and Cut Technology (Caiman?): A Prospective, Comparative, and Multi-Institutional Study
【24h】

Peri-Operative Outcomes after Open and Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy by Using an Advanced Bipolar Seal and Cut Technology (Caiman?): A Prospective, Comparative, and Multi-Institutional Study

机译:使用先进的双极封切技术(Caiman?)进行开放性和机器人辅助的根治性膀胱切除术后的围手术期结果:一项前瞻性,比较和多机构研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Objective: To report and compare the peri-operative outcomes of patients undergoing open (ORC) and robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) for bladder cancer performed with a radiofrequency seal and cut device (Caiman?). Materials and Methods: Data of patients undergoing ORC or RARC between January 2015 and March 2016 at 6 Italian institutions were prospectively recorded and analyzed. Thirty-and 90-day complications were stratified according to the Martin's criteria and graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Data on operative time, blood loss, transfusion rate, complications, and length of stay were evaluated and compared between the ORC and RARC groups. Results: Thirty-three (66%) and 17 (34%) patients were treated with ORC and RARC, respectively. The median age was 72 (64-78) years. Overall operative time was longer in RARC compared to ORC (389 ± 80.1 vs. 242 ± 62.2 min, p Conclusion: Open and robot-assisted procedures were safely performed by using a new advanced bipolar seal and cut technology (Caiman?). RARC demonstrated to be superior to ORC in terms of bleeding, transfusion rates and length of hospital stay, despite longer operative time.
机译:目的:报告并比较接受射频密封切开装置(Caiman?)的开放式(ORC)和机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(RARC)治疗膀胱癌的患者的围手术期结果。材料和方法:前瞻性地记录和分析了2015年1月至2016年3月在意大利6家机构接受ORC或RARC的患者的数据。根据马丁的标准对30天和90天的并发症进行分层,并根据Clavien-Dindo分类进行分级。评估并比较了ORC组和RARC组的手术时间,失血量,输血率,并发症和住院时间等数据。结果:分别对33例(66%)和17例(34%)的患者进行了ORC和RARC治疗。中位年龄为72(64-78)岁。与ORC相比,RARC的总体手术时间更长(389±80.1 vs. 242±62.2 min,p)结论:使用新型先进的双极密封和切割技术(Caiman?)可以安全地执行开放和机器人辅助手术。尽管手术时间更长,但在出血,输血速度和住院时间方面仍优于ORC。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号