...
首页> 外文期刊>Conservation Letters >Testing Focus Groups as a Tool for Connecting Indigenous and Local Knowledge on Abundance of Natural resources with Science‐Based Land Management Systems
【24h】

Testing Focus Groups as a Tool for Connecting Indigenous and Local Knowledge on Abundance of Natural resources with Science‐Based Land Management Systems

机译:测试焦点小组,作为将自然资源丰富的土著和地方知识与基于科学的土地管理系统联系起来的工具

获取原文
           

摘要

AbstractOne of the clearly stated intentions of the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) is to bring both “western scientific” and “indigenous and local” knowledge systems within synthetic global, regional, and thematic assessments. A major challenge will be how to use, and quality-assure, information derived from different knowledge systems. We test how indigenous and local knowledge on natural resources in Miskito and Mayangna communities in Nicaragua, validated through focus groups with community members, compares with information collected on line transects by trained scientists. Both provide comparable data on natural resource abundance, but focus groups are eight times cheaper. Such approaches could increase the amount and geographical scope of information available for assessments at all levels, while simultaneously empowering indigenous and local communities who generally have limited engagement in such processes.
机译:摘要政府间生物多样性和生态系统服务平台(IPBES)明确表达了其意图之一,就是将“西方科学”知识体系和“土著和地方”知识体系纳入全球,区域和主题的综合评估中。一个主要的挑战将是如何使用和质量保证来自不同知识系统的信息。我们测试了尼加拉瓜Miskito和Mayangna社区对自然资源的土著和地方知识,并通过与社区成员的焦点小组进行了验证,并与经过培训的科学家在在线样线上收集的信息进行了比较。两者都提供了有关自然资源丰富度的可比数据,但是焦点小组的价格便宜了八倍。这种方法可增加各级可用于评估的信息的数量和地理范围,同时增强通常参与此类过程的土著和地方社区的能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号