...
首页> 外文期刊>Current neuropharmacology >The Role of Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) in Bipolar Disorder: Effectiveness in 522 Patients with Bipolar Depression, Mixed-state, Mania and Catatonic Features
【24h】

The Role of Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) in Bipolar Disorder: Effectiveness in 522 Patients with Bipolar Depression, Mixed-state, Mania and Catatonic Features

机译:电痉挛疗法(ECT)在双相情感障碍中的作用:522例双相抑郁,混合状态,躁狂和紧张性脑瘫患者的有效性

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Bipolar disorder (BD) is a serious and extremely recurrent illness frequently associated with cognitive and functional deterioration that poses many treatment challenges [1]. Despite a growing armamentarium of psychotropic medications, many patients with BD remain refractory to pharmacological treatment, relapses are common and morbidity and mortality remain elevated [2-9]. Because of the high rate of treatment nonresponse, the use of complex polypharmacy has increased dramatically over the years [10, 11]. Although there are several examples of “rational polypharmacy” [12, 13] and anecdotal evidence that some BD patients may benefit from certain complex regimens, the increased reliance on polypharmacy occurred in the absenceof any controlled evidence. Indeed, the efficacy of combined treatment consisting of three or more medications is not demonstrated [14]. Whether “rational” or “irrational”, the medication burden associated with increased use of complex polypharmacy raises several concerns including increased switches rate, rapid cycling, treatment resistance, apart from adverse side effects [13] due to drug interactions [14] and patient nonadherence [15-17]. Concern about the efficacy of current treatments for BD has been particularly marked for bipolar depression: adjunctive second-generation anti-depressants over monotherapy with mood stabilizers do not seem to bring any benefit [16]. Moreover, a recent prospective naturalistic longitudinal study [18] reported a significantly lower likelihood of recovery in BD inpatients with depressive compared to those with manic episodes.Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has a unique place in the therapeutic armamentarium for BD; it has been shown useful as an acute treatment of severe depressive, manic and mixed states [19-25], in highly suicidal patients, in those presenting with catatonia, and in those with drugs refractory disease [26]. The limitations of pharmacotherapy indicate the need for a better definition of the role of ECT in BD. All BD treatment guidelines suggest that ECT should be applied only in pharmacotherapy-resistant or very severe cases [26-31]. Accordingly, ECT is not included as one of the first treatment options for either the manic or depressive phase, independently from the severity or the variety of clinical presentation.However, in clinical practice, there is a broad consensus on the use of ECT in several groups of patients with severe clinical pictures, often in situations of emergency, as a first-line treatment; in such cases, ECT should be considered earlier than psychotropic medications. This is the case of patients with suicidal ideation and behavior, severe weight loss, malnutrition, dehydration and globally exhausted for protracted depressive or manic episode, [32], severe mixed state and catatonia. On the other hand, there is a significant variability among psychiatrists on the timing of referring patients affected by treatment-resistant mood disorders for ECT. Most practitioners take into account ECT only when the patient have not responded to several pharmacological treatments; such attempts may last for months or years, prolonging the patient's suffering. The length of episode seems to correlate with treatment resistance and poor outcome after ECT, a key point to discourage the use of ECT as a ‘last resort’ option [33].Bipolar DepressionThe studies supporting the effectiveness of ECT in severe and refractory depression have been conducted mostly in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). ECT in BD depression is less extensively studied [19, 22]. This is rather unexpected, because literature data showed significant differences in antidepressants’ efficacy between MDD and BD depression [16]. Not only depression in BD patients resulted less responsive than in MDD, but also the use of antidepressants may induce manic switching, mixed states (MS) and cycle acceleration [34, 35]. A better response to ECT was also observed in patients suffering from
机译:躁郁症(BD)是一种严重且极度复发的疾病,通常与认知和功能恶化相关,带来许多治疗挑战[1]。尽管增加了精神药物的使用范围,但许多BD患者仍然无法接受药物治疗,复发很常见,发病率和死亡率仍然很高[2-9]。由于治疗无反应的发生率很高,多年来,复杂的多药店的使用急剧增加[10,11]。尽管有几个“合理的多药店”的例子[12,13]和一些证据表明某些BD患者可能会从某些复杂的治疗方案中受益,但是在没有任何可控证据的情况下,对多药店的依赖增加了。实际上,由三种或三种以上药物组成的联合治疗的疗效尚未得到证实[14]。无论是“理性的”还是“非理性的”,与复杂的综合药店使用增加相关的药物负担引起了一些担忧,包括增加转换率,快速循环,治疗耐药性,以及由于药物相互作用[14]和患者引起的不良副作用[13]。不遵守[15-17]。对于双相抑郁症,目前对BD疗法的疗效的关注特别明显:与单一疗法联合使用情绪稳定剂后,第二代辅助抗抑郁药似乎并未带来任何益处[16]。此外,最近的一项前瞻性自然纵向研究[18]报告说,与躁狂发作相比,抑郁症的BD住院患者康复的可能性要低得多。电惊厥疗法(ECT)在BD的治疗药房中占有独特的地位;它已显示出可用于重度抑郁,躁狂和混合状态的急性治疗[19-25],高度自杀的患者,患有卡塔托尼亚的患者以及患有药物难治性疾病的患者[26]。药物治疗的局限性表明需要更好地定义ECT在BD中的作用。所有BD治疗指南均建议仅在耐药性或非常严重的病例中应用ECT [26-31]。因此,无论临床表现的严重程度或种类如何,都不将ECT作为躁狂期或抑郁期的首选治疗方法之一。然而,在临床实践中,对于在若干实践中使用ECT已有广泛共识一线治疗,通常在紧急情况下,具有严重临床影像的患者组;在这种情况下,应该比精神药物更早地考虑使用ECT。这种情况的患者有自杀意念和行为,严重的体重减轻,营养不良,脱水并且因长期的抑郁或躁狂发作而全身疲倦,[32],严重的混合状态和卡塔尼亚。另一方面,精神科医师之间在转诊接受耐治疗性情绪障碍影响的患者接受ECT的时间方面存在很大差异。大多数医生只有在患者对几种药理疗法没有反应时才考虑使用ECT。这样的尝试可能持续数月或数年,延长了患者的痛苦。发作时间的长短似乎与ECT后的治疗抵抗力和不良预后相关,这是阻止使用ECT作为“最后手段”的关键[33]。双相抑郁症支持ECT在严重和难治性抑郁症中的有效性的研究已有主要在重度抑郁症(MDD)患者中进行。 BD抑郁症的ECT研究较少[19,22]。这是相当出乎意料的,因为文献数据显示MDD和BD抑郁症之间抗抑郁药的疗效存在显着差异[16]。不仅BD患者的抑郁症疗效不及MDD缓解,而且使用抗抑郁药还可能诱发躁狂转换,混合状态(MS)和周期加速[34,35]。患有以下疾病的患者对ECT的反应也更好

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号