首页> 外文期刊>Creative Education >The Paradoxical Nature of Academic Measures and Creativity
【24h】

The Paradoxical Nature of Academic Measures and Creativity

机译:学术手段与创造力的悖论性

获取原文
       

摘要

This study investigates the relationship between high stakes college admissions tests and creativity. One hundred eighteen college students majoring in education were given the Epstein Creativity Competencies Inventory (ECC-I). We examined the total creativity competency score as well as the four different skill areas: Preserves new Ideas; Seeks Challenges: Broadens Skills and Knowledge; and Changes Physical and Social Environment. The students’ ACT and SAT scores were com- pared with their scores on the ECC-I. Results indicate that students with lower ACT scores, scored higher overall on the creativity survey than students with high ACT scores. There was a negative correlation between the students Capturing creativity scores and their SAT scores. This indicates that students with higher SATs rated themselves lower in paying attention to and preserving new ideas; that is, capturing new ideas as they occur. There is a need in our society for innovative and creative thinkers, however, American colleges and universities are still predicting the ability to succeed in college with traditional measures.
机译:本研究调查高风险大学入学考试与创造力之间的关系。向118名教育专业的大学生提供了爱泼斯坦创造力能力清单(ECC-I)。我们检查了总的创造力能力得分以及四个不同的技能领域:保留新想法;寻求挑战:扩大技能和知识;和改变物理和社会环境。将学生的ACT和SAT分数与他们在ECC-I上的分数进行比较。结果表明,ACT得分较低的学生在创造力调查中的总体得分高于ACT得分较高的学生。捕获创造力分数与他们的SAT分数之间呈负相关。这表明SAT考试成绩较高的学生在关注和保存新思想方面得分较低。也就是说,在新思想出现时捕捉它们。在我们的社会中,需要创新和创造性的思想家,但是,美国的大学和学院仍在预测采用传统方法在大学中取得成功的能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号