首页> 外文期刊>Creative Education >Comparative Study between Teaching Football with Oral and Oral/Graphic Verbalization
【24h】

Comparative Study between Teaching Football with Oral and Oral/Graphic Verbalization

机译:口语和图形/口头表达教学足球的比较研究

获取原文
       

摘要

The aim of this study was to compare two methods of teaching using two different modalities of verbalization: oral and oral/graphic. We opted for a quantitative-comparative analysis of the pupils’ language typologies taken from oral and written productions of third secondary grade pupils who play football in a professional club (juniors of Olympic Kef, IInd league, 18 years old on average). The comparisons between the group proceeding to an oral verbalization versus the group using an oral/graphic one as well as intra-groups’ comparisons did not show clear significant differences. Despite of a statistical signification absence, we note that the two teams made a progress (increase in the number of played and conquered balls and the shots on target) especially during the last three sessions. Indeed, the debate of ideas is a process. It is relevant that the interaction between learning oral and graphic verbalization is more dynamic, whenever pupils verbalize orally and graphically, they are more motivated to learn.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较两种使用两种不同口头表达方式的教学方法:口头和口头/图形。我们选择了对学生的语言类型进行定量比较分析,这些语言类型是从在专业俱乐部踢足球的三年级三年级学生的口头和书面作品中摘取的(平均年龄为18岁,奥林匹克凯夫,初级,二等)。进行口头口头表达的组与使用口头/图解法的组之间的比较以及组内的比较未显示明显的显着差异。尽管没有统计意义,但我们注意到两支球队取得了进步(增加了打球和被征服的球的数量以及射门次数),尤其是在最近三场比赛中。确实,关于思想的辩论是一个过程。有意义的是,学习口头和图形口头表达之间的互动是更动态的,每当学生通过口头和图形方式口头表达时,他们就会更有动力学习。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号