...
首页> 外文期刊>Contemporary Clinical Dentistry >Sealing ability of mineral trioxide aggregate Plus? and Biodentine? for repair of furcal perforation in primary molars: An in vitro study
【24h】

Sealing ability of mineral trioxide aggregate Plus? and Biodentine? for repair of furcal perforation in primary molars: An in vitro study

机译:三氧化二矿骨料的密封能力Plus?和Biodentine?修复磨牙磨牙穿孔的体外研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: One of the unfavorable outcomes of endodontic treatment in primary molars is furcal perforation. During treatment, bacterial infection at the site ofperforation should be prevented for better prognosis. Aim: This study aims to compare sealing ability of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) Plus? and Biodentine?for the repair of furcal perforation in primary molars using spectrophotometry. Materials and Methods: Access opening was done for all ninety extracted teeth.Perforation was made in furcation area in all the teeth. The sample size consisted of ninety extracted teeth. They were divided into four groups, Group 1 (n = 30) inwhich perforations were repaired with MTA Plus?, Group 2 (n = 30) in which perforations were repaired with Biodentine?. The other two groups were consideredas control groups, Group 3 (n = 15) in which perforations were left unsealed (positive control) and Group 4 (n = 15) without perforations (negative control). Dyeextraction method was used to compare the sealing ability of MTA Plus? and Biodentine?. Statistical analysis was done using ANOVA test to compare the meanbetween the different groups. Intergroup comparison was performed using post hoc Scheffe test. Results: The highest dye absorbance was seen in the positivecontrol group with a mean value of 0.080 ± 0.033. The mean value of MTA Plus? was 0.031 ± 0.026 and Biodentine? was 0.024 ± 0.031. Conclusion: Themean value of dye absorption of MTA Plus? was greater than Biodentine? but it was statistically insignificant.
机译:背景:在原发性磨牙中进行牙髓治疗的不利结果之一是分叉穿孔。在治疗过程中,应预防穿孔部位的细菌感染,以更好地预后。目的:本研究旨在比较三氧化二矿物骨料(MTA)Plus的密封能力?和Biodentine?用分光光度法修复原发性磨牙的分叉穿孔。材料与方法:对所有90颗拔出的牙齿进行进入开口,并在所有牙齿的分叉区域打孔。样本大小包括90颗拔牙。他们分为四组:第一组(n = 30),其中用MTA Plus?修复穿孔;第二组(n = 30),其中用Biodentine?修复穿孔。其他两组被视为对照组,第3组(n = 15),其中未打孔的穿孔(阳性对照组)和第4组(n = 15),无穿孔(阴性对照组)。用染料提取法比较了MTA Plus的密封能力。和Biodentine ?。使用ANOVA检验进行统计分析,以比较不同组之间的均值。使用事后Scheffe检验进行组间比较。结果:阳性对照组的染料吸收率最高,平均值为0.080±0.033。 MTA Plus的平均值是多少?是0.031±0.026和Biodentine?为0.024±0.031。结论:MTA Plus染料吸收的主题价值?大于Biodentine?但这在统计上微不足道。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号