首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Medicine: Oncology >Phase II Study of S-1 Monotherapy as a First-line, Combination Therapy of S-1 plus Cisplatin as a Second-line, and Weekly Paclitaxel Monotherapy as a Third-line Therapy in Patients with Advanced Gastric Carcinoma
【24h】

Phase II Study of S-1 Monotherapy as a First-line, Combination Therapy of S-1 plus Cisplatin as a Second-line, and Weekly Paclitaxel Monotherapy as a Third-line Therapy in Patients with Advanced Gastric Carcinoma

机译:晚期胃癌患者以S-1单药为一线治疗,S-1加顺铂为二线联合治疗和每周紫杉醇单药为三线治疗的II期研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: We conducted a pilot phase II study to evaluate the ef?cacy and safety of S-1 as a ?rst-line, S-1 plus cisplatin as a second-line, and weekly paclitaxel as a third-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer.Patients and methods: Between 2002 and 2005, 19 patients were enrolled in this study. Chemotherapy consisted of either 60 mg/m2 of S-1 for 4 weeks at 6 weeks interval, a combination of 60 mg/m2 S-1 for 3 weeks and 60 mg/m2 cisplatin on day 8 at 5 weeks interval, or 60 mg/m2 paclitaxel at day 1, 8, 15, at 4 weeks interval. The regimen was repeated until the occurrence of unacceptable toxicities, disease progression, or patient refusal. The primary end point was the overall survival.Results: The response rates were 33.3%, 12.5%, and 0% after the ?rst, second, and third line chemotherapy, respectively. The mean overall survival time was 994 days. The median survival time could not be calculated because 12 out of 19 patients were still alive when the study was concluded. Regarding hematological toxicity, the major adverse effect was leukopenia, which reached grades 3–4 in all lines of chemotherapy investigated. In addition, regarding non-hematological toxicities, the major adverse effect was anorexia, which reached grade 3-4 in the second line chemotherapy, and no deaths were attributable to the adverse effects of the drugs.Conclusion: This sequential therapy was an effective treatment for advanced gastric cancer with acceptable toxic side-effects. We considered this sequential therapy to be effective because of the smooth switch to the next regimen.
机译:背景:我们进行了II期试验性研究,以评估S-1作为一线药物,S-1加顺铂作为二线药物以及每周紫杉醇作为三线药物治疗晚期患者的疗效和安全性患者和方法:2002年至2005年,该研究招募了19例患者。化学疗法包括60 mg / m2 S-1间隔6周,4周,60 mg / m2 S-1间隔3周和第8天以5周间隔60 mg / m2顺铂或60 mg的组合第1天,第8天,第15天,每4周间隔紫杉醇/ m2。重复该方案,直到出现不可接受的毒性,疾病进展或患者拒绝治疗。主要终点是总生存期。结果:一线,二线和三线化疗后的缓解率分别为33.3%,12.5%和0%。平均总生存时间为994天。研究结束时,无法计算中位生存时间,因为19名患者中有12名还活着。关于血液学毒性,主要的不良反应是白细胞减少症,在所研究的所有化疗方案中,白细胞减少症均达到3-4级。此外,就非血液学毒性而言,主要的不良反应是厌食症,在二线化疗中达到了3-4级,并且没有因药物的不良反应而导致死亡。结论:这种序贯疗法是有效的治疗方法用于具有可接受的毒副作用的晚期胃癌。由于顺利过渡到下一个方案,我们认为这种序贯疗法是有效的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号