首页> 外文期刊>Computational linguistics >Entropy, the Indus Script, and Language:A Reply to R. Sproat
【24h】

Entropy, the Indus Script, and Language:A Reply to R. Sproat

机译:熵,印度语脚本和语言:对R. Sproat的答复

获取原文
       

摘要

We find these properties to be as follows: (1) Linearity: The Indus texts are linearly written, like the vast majority of linguistic scripts (and unlike nonlinguistic systems such as medieval heraldry, Boy Scout merit badges, or highway/airport signs, systems frequently mentioned by Sproat and colleagues). (2) Directionality: There is clear evi- dence for directionality in the script: Texts were usually written from right to left, a fact that can be inferred, for example, from a sign being overwritten by another on its left on pottery (Lal 1966). Directionality is a universal characteristic of linguistic systems but not necessarily of nonlinguistic systems (e.g., heraldry, Boy Scout badges). (3) Use of Diacritical Marks: Indus symbols are often modified by the addition of specific sets of marks over, around, or inside a symbol.
机译:我们发现这些属性如下:(1)线性:印度语文本是线性书写的,就像绝大多数语言的脚本一样(并且不同于中世纪的纹章,童子军功绩徽章或高速公路/机场标志,系统等非语言系统)经常被Sproat及其同事提及)。 (2)方向性:脚本中的方向性很明显:文本通常是从右到左书写的,可以推断出一个事实,例如,从陶器左侧的另一个牌子覆盖了一个牌子(Lal) 1966)。方向性是语言系统的普遍特征,但不一定是非语言系统的特征(例如,纹章,童子军徽章)。 (3)变音符号的使用:印度梧桐符号通常通过在符号上方,周围或内部添加特定的标记集来进行修改。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号