首页> 外文期刊>Clinical and Experimental Dental Research >A strain gauge analysis comparing 4‐unit veneered zirconium dioxide implant‐borne fixed dental prosthesis on engaging and non‐engaging abutments before and after torque application
【24h】

A strain gauge analysis comparing 4‐unit veneered zirconium dioxide implant‐borne fixed dental prosthesis on engaging and non‐engaging abutments before and after torque application

机译:应变仪分析比较施加扭矩之前和之后的4个单板贴面二氧化锆种植体固定式义齿在接合和非接合基台上的情况

获取原文
       

摘要

This study quantified the strain development after inserting implant‐borne fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) to various implant–abutment joints. Two bone‐level implants (??=?4.1?mm, RC, SLA 10?mm, Ti, Straumann) were inserted in polyurethane models ( N ?=?3) in the area of tooth nos 44 and 47. Four‐unit veneered zirconium dioxide FDPs ( n ?=?2) were fabricated, one of which was fixed on engaging (E; RC Variobase, ??=?4.5?mm, H ?=?3.5?mm) and the other on non‐engaging (NE) abutments (RC Variobase, ??=?4.5?mm, H ?=?5.5?mm). One strain gauge was bonded to the occlusal surface of pontic no. 46 on the FDP and the other two on the polyurethane model. Before (baseline) and after torque (35?Ncm), strain values were recorded three times. Data were analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests (α?=?0.05). Mean strain values presented significant increase after torque for both E and NE implant–abutment connection type (baseline: E?=?4.33?±?4.38; NE?=?4.85?±?4.85; torque: E?=?196.56?±?188.02; NE?=?275.63?±?407.7; p ??.05). Mean strain values based on implant level presented significant increase after torque for both E and NE implant–abutment connection (baseline: E?=?4.94?±?5.29; NE?=?5.78?±?5.69; torque: E?=?253.78?±?178.14; NE?=?347.72?±?493.06; p ??.05). The position of the strain gauge on implants ( p ?=?.895), FDP ( p ?=?.275), and abutment connection type ( p ?=?.873) did not significantly affect the strain values. Strain levels for zirconium dioxide implant‐borne FDPs were not affected by the implant–abutment connection type.
机译:这项研究量化了将种植体固定的牙修复体(FDP)插入各种种植体-基台关节后的应变发展。在聚氨酯模型(N == 3)中,在第44和47号牙齿区域插入了两个骨水平植入物(Δθ=?4.1?mm,RC,SLA 10?mm,Ti,Straumann)。四单元制作了单板化二氧化锆FDP(n?=?2),其中一个固定在接合状态(E; RC Variobase,?=?4.5?mm,H?=?3.5?mm),另一个固定在非接合状态(NE)基台(RC Variobase,Δθ=?4.5?mm,H?=?5.5?mm)。将一个应变仪粘结到1号桥体的咬合面上。 FDP上为46,聚氨酯模型上为另外两个。扭矩之前(基线)和扭矩之后(35?Ncm),记录了3次应变值。使用Kruskal-Wallis和Mann-Whitney U检验分析数据(α?=?0.05)。对于E和NE种植体-基台连接类型,平均应变值在扭矩作用下均显着增加(基线:E?=?4.33?±?4.38; NE?=?4.85?±?4.85;扭矩:E?=?196.56?± ≤188.02;NE≤=275.63≤±407.7;p≤<0.05。对于E和NE种植体-基台连接,基于种植体水平的平均应变值在扭矩作用下均显着增加(基线:E?=?4.94?±?5.29; NE?=?5.78?±?5.69;扭矩:E?=? 253.78±±178.14; NE == 347.72±±493.06; p << 0.05。应变计在植入物上的位置(p = = 0.895),FDP(p = = 0.275)和基台连接类型(p = = 0.873)对应变值没有显着影响。二氧化锆植入物基FDP的应变水平不受植入物-基台连接类型的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号