...
首页> 外文期刊>Coluna/Columna >AVALIA??O DO CONHECIMENTO DE ESCALA DE DOR NEUROPáTICAEVALUACIóN DEL CONOCIMIENTO DE ESCALA DE DOLOR NEUROPáTICO
【24h】

AVALIA??O DO CONHECIMENTO DE ESCALA DE DOR NEUROPáTICAEVALUACIóN DEL CONOCIMIENTO DE ESCALA DE DOLOR NEUROPáTICO

机译:评估神经病理性DOR量表的知识评估神经病性疼痛的量表

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives: Neuropathic pain (ND) is defined as “one that results from injury or disease that directly affects the somatosensory system”, differing from other types of pain in terms of symptoms, mechanisms and therapeutics, being the early diagnosis prerequisite for the appropriate management. Pain evaluation scales are very useful in clinical diagnosis. It is critical that orthopedic doctors are familiar with such tools. The objective was to evaluate whether the orthopedic physicians in Salvador know the tools of evaluation and clinical diagnosis of neuropathic pain (ND), as well as to determine which method of evaluation of ND is most used in their clinical practice. Methods: Data were analyzed from 74 orthopedic physicians working in the city of Salvador, who were interviewed from January to November 2017. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire consisting of subjective and objective questions and analyzed with SPSS 22.0 software. Results: Among the interviewed physicians, 41.9% knew some of the scales and, of these, 64.5% used in their clinical practice, being 70.3% of the total sample. The LANSS scale was used by 25.8% of the physicians in their practice as a tool to diagnose neuropathic pain, 22.6% used DN4 and 35.5% did not use any. Conclusions: The orthopedic physicians know little about the tools of evaluation and diagnosis of neuropathic pain and those with greater time of activity know less these tools than those who have less time. Many who know the tools do not use them in their clinical practice. LANSS and DN4 are the most commonly used scales. Level of Evidence III; Cross Sectional Study .
机译:目的:神经性疼痛(ND)的定义是“由直接影响体感系统的损伤或疾病引起的疼痛”,在症状,机制和治疗方法上不同于其他类型的疼痛,是适当治疗的早期诊断先决条件。疼痛评估量表在临床诊断中非常有用。骨科医生必须熟悉此类工具,这一点至关重要。目的是评估萨尔瓦多的骨科医生是否了解评估和临床诊断神经性疼痛(ND)的工具,并确定在其临床实践中最常使用的ND评估方法。方法:数据分析来自萨尔瓦多市的74位骨科医师,他们于2017年1月至11月接受了访谈。通过包含主观和客观问题的结构化问卷收集数据,并使用SPSS 22.0软件进行分析。结果:在接受采访的医生中,有41.9%知道一些量表,其中64.5%用于临床实践,占总样本的70.3%。在实践中,有25.8%的医师使用LANSS量表作为诊断神经性疼痛的工具,其中22.6%的患者使用了DN4,而35.5%的患者则没有使用。结论:骨科医生对神经性疼痛的评估和诊断工具知之甚少,活动时间长的人比时间短的人少。许多知道该工具的人在其临床实践中并未使用它们。 LANSS和DN4是最常用的秤。证据等级III;横断面研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号