首页> 外文期刊>Coluna/Columna >LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IN THE PLACEMENT OF TRANSPEDICULAR SCREWS IN SUBAXIAL CERVICAL SPINE
【24h】

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IN THE PLACEMENT OF TRANSPEDICULAR SCREWS IN SUBAXIAL CERVICAL SPINE

机译:在亚轴颈椎椎弓根螺钉放置中的证据水平

获取原文
           

摘要

The high-energy trauma mainly involves vertebral lesions and 6% occur in the cervical region. This poses a challenge to spine surgeons in surgical decision-making, both in terms of approach as the instrumentation. International recommendations establish that the procedures performed are reproducible, safe, and effective. The techniques for placement of pedicle screws are complicated and have been based on intraoperative navigation (limited by cost) and fluoroscopy (greater exposure of health care professionals and patients to radiation). Therefore, the freehand technique is an option. The goal was to identify the level of evidence and grade of recommendation in the medical literature regarding the safety and efficacy of pedicle screw instrumentation with freehand technique in subaxial cervical spine. To this end, we carried out a systematic review with the following MeSH terms: safety, efficacy, vertebral artery. Articles were evaluated twice in a standardized and blind way by two observers skilled in systematic analysis, after CLEIS 3401 authorization in November 2014. Due to the nature of the study and the variables, articles with a high level of evidence and grade of recommendation were not found. Level of Evidence obtained on safety and efficacy in the placement of pedicle screws in subaxial column with freehand technique: 2b. Degree of Recommendation obtained on safety and efficacy in the placement of pedicle screws in subaxial column with freehand technique: B, favorable recommendation.
机译:高能创伤主要累及椎骨病变,其中6%发生在颈椎区域。无论是作为仪器的方法,这都对脊柱外科医生的手术决策提出了挑战。国际建议确定所执行的程序是可重复的,安全的和有效的。椎弓根螺钉的放置技术很复杂,并且基于术中导航(受成本限制)和荧光检查(医疗保健专业人员和患者接受放射线照射的程度更大)。因此,徒手画法是一种选择。目的是确定医学文献中有关徒手操作椎弓根螺钉器械在颈椎下轴中的安全性和有效性的证据水平和推荐等级。为此,我们使用以下MeSH术语进行了系统评价:安全性,疗效,椎动脉。在2014年11月获得CLEIS 3401授权后,由两名具有系统分析经验的观察员以标准化,盲目的方式对文章进行了两次评估。由于研究的性质和变量的影响,具有较高证据水平和推荐等级的文章并不适用找到了。使用徒手技术在椎弓根螺钉中放置椎弓根螺钉的安全性和有效性的证据水平:2b。使用徒手技术获得的关于在椎弓根螺钉置入椎弓根螺钉中的安全性和有效性的推荐程度:B,推荐。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号