首页> 外文期刊>Clinical proteomics. >Immobilized pH gradient-driven paper-based IEF: a new method for fractionating complex peptide mixtures before MS analysis
【24h】

Immobilized pH gradient-driven paper-based IEF: a new method for fractionating complex peptide mixtures before MS analysis

机译:固定pH梯度驱动的纸质IEF:一种在MS分析之前分离复杂肽混合物的新方法

获取原文
       

摘要

Introduction The vast difference in the abundance of different proteins in biological samples limits the determination of the complete proteome of a cell type, requiring fractionation of proteins and peptides before MS analysis. Methods We present a method consisting of electrophoresis of complex mixtures of peptides using a strip of filter paper cut into 20 sections laid end to end over a 24-cm-long IPG strip, the pH gradient of which would drive the electrophoresis. Peptides absorbed onto individual paper pads after electrophoresis are subsequently recovered into a buffer solution, thus dividing a complex peptide mixture according to pI into 20 liquid fractions. This paper-based IEF method (PIEF) was compared side-by-side with a similar but liquid-based Offgel electrophoresis (OGE) by analyzing iTRAQ-labeled peptide mixtures of membrane proteins from four different cell types. Results PIEF outperformed OGE in resolving acidic peptides, whereas OGE did a better job in recovering relatively basic peptides. OGE and PIEF were quite comparable in their coverage, identifying almost equal number of distinct proteins (PIEF =1174; OGE = 1080). Interestingly, however, only 675 were identified by both of them, each method identifying many unique proteins (PIEF = 499; OGE = 415). Thus, the two methods uncovered almost 40% more proteins compared to what is obtained by only one method. Conclusion : This initial investigation demonstrates the technical feasibility of PIEF for complementing OGE. PIEF uses standard IPG IEF equipment, requires no specialized apparatus (e.g., OGE fractionator) and may be integrated into peptide mapping strategies for clinical samples.
机译:简介生物样品中不同蛋白质丰度的巨大差异限制了细胞类型完整蛋白质组的测定,因此需要在MS分析之前对蛋白质和多肽进行分级分离。方法我们提出了一种方法,该方法包括使用一条狭长的滤纸条对复杂的肽混合物进行电泳,将其切成20段,并在24厘米长的IPG条带上首尾相连,其pH梯度将驱动电泳。电泳后吸收到各个纸垫上的肽随后被回收到缓冲溶液中,从而根据pI将复杂的肽混合物分成20个液体部分。通过分析iTRAQ标记的来自四种不同细胞类型的膜蛋白的肽混合物,将该基于纸张的IEF方法(PIEF)与相似但基于液体的Offgel电泳(OGE)进行了比较。结果PIEF在分离酸性肽方面胜过OGE,而OGE在回收相对碱性的肽方面做得更好。 OGE和PIEF的覆盖范围相当,可以鉴定出几乎相等数量的不同蛋白质(PIEF = 1174; OGE = 1080)。然而,有趣的是,这两种方法都只能鉴定出675种,每种方法都鉴定出许多独特的蛋白质(PIEF = 499; OGE = 415)。因此,与仅通过一种方法获得的蛋白质相比,这两种方法发现的蛋白质增加了近40%。结论:这项初步研究证明了PIEF补充OGE的技术可行性。 PIEF使用标准IPG IEF设备,不需要专门的设备(例如OGE分离器),并且可以集成到临床样品的肽图分析策略中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号