首页> 外文期刊>Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health >Comparative Validity of Screening Instruments for Mental Distress in Zambia
【24h】

Comparative Validity of Screening Instruments for Mental Distress in Zambia

机译:赞比亚心理困扰筛查工具的比较有效性

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: The recognition of mental health as a major contributor to the global burden of disease has led to an increase in the demand for the inclusion of mental health services in primary health care as well as in community-based health surveys in order to improve screening, diagnosis and treatment of mental distress. Many screening instruments are now available. However, the cultural validity of these instruments to detect mental distress has rarely been investigated in developing countries. In these countries, limited trained staff and specialized psychiatric facilities hamper improvement of mental health services. It is therefore imperative to develop a quick, low cost screening instrument that does not require specialized training. We validated different well established screening instruments among primary health care clinic attendees in Lusaka, Zambia. We also assess the face, content and criterion validity of the SRQ’s and determined the most commonly reported symptoms for mental distress.
机译:背景:认识到精神健康是造成全球疾病负担的主要因素,导致对将精神卫生服务纳入初级卫生保健以及基于社区的健康调查以改善筛查的需求增加,精神困扰的诊治。现在有许多筛选工具。但是,在发展中国家很少研究这些检测精神困扰的工具的文化有效性。在这些国家,训练有素的工作人员和专门的精神病学设施有限,阻碍了精神卫生服务的改善。因此,必须开发一种无需专业培训的快速,低成本的筛查仪器。我们在赞比亚卢萨卡的初级卫生保健诊所参与者中验证了各种完善的筛查工具。我们还会评估SRQ的面孔,内容和标准有效性,并确定最常报告的精神困扰症状。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号