首页> 外文期刊>Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health >The distribution of the common mental disorders: social inequalities in Europe
【24h】

The distribution of the common mental disorders: social inequalities in Europe

机译:常见精神障碍的分布:欧洲的社会不平等

获取原文
       

摘要

Background The social class distribution of the common mental disorders (mostly anxiety and/or depression) has been in doubt until recently. This paper reviews the evidence of associations between the prevalence of the common mental disorders in adults of working age and markers of socio-economic disadvantage. Methods Work is reviewed which brings together major population surveys from the last 25 years, together with work trawling for all European population studies. Data from more recent studies is examined, analysed and discussed. Because of differences in methods, instruments and analyses, little can be compared precsiely, but internal associations can be examined. Findings People of lower socio-economic status, however measured, are disadvantaged, and this includes higher frequencies of the conditions now called the 'common mental disorders' (mostly non-psychotic depression and anxiety, either separately or together). In European and similar developed populations, relatively high frequencies are associated with poor education, material disadvantage and unemployment. Conclusion The large contribution of the common mental disorders to morbidity and disability, and the social consequences in working age adults would justify substantial priority being given to addressing mental health inequalities, and deprivation in general, within national and European social and economic policy.
机译:背景技术直到最近,常见精神障碍(主要是焦虑和/或抑郁)的社会阶层分布一直受到质疑。本文回顾了在劳动年龄的成年人中常见精神障碍的患病率与社会经济劣势标志之间的关联性证据。方法对工作进行了回顾,该工作汇集了过去25年的主要人口调查以及所有欧洲人口研究的工作拖网。对来自最近研究的数据进行了检查,分析和讨论。由于方法,仪器和分析方法的差异,几乎无法精确比较,但可以检查内部关联。研究结果社会经济地位较低的人,无论衡量多少,都处于不利地位,这包括现在被称为“常见精神障碍”(多数为非精神病性抑郁症和焦虑症,分别或共同存在)的频率更高。在欧洲和类似的发达人口中,较高的频率与教育水平低下,物质上的劣势和失业有关。结论在国家和欧洲的社会和经济政策中,常见的精神障碍对发病率和残疾的巨大贡献以及对工作年龄成年人的社会后果将证明在解决心理健康不平等和总体上的剥夺方面应给予实质性优先考虑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号