首页> 外文期刊>Cogent Engineering >Assessment of unsteady-RANS approach against steady-RANS approach for predicting twin impinging jets in a cross-flow
【24h】

Assessment of unsteady-RANS approach against steady-RANS approach for predicting twin impinging jets in a cross-flow

机译:相对于稳态RANS方法的非稳态RANS方法评估,以预测横流中的双撞击射流

获取原文
           

摘要

A complex flow field is created when a vertical/short take-off and landing aircraft is operating near ground. One major concern for this kind of aircraft in ground effect is the possibility of ingestion of hot gases from the jet engine exhausts back into the engine, known as hot gas ingestion, which can increase the intake air temperature and also reduce the oxygen content in the intake air, potentially leading to compressor stall, low combustion efficiency and causing a dramatic loss of lift. This flow field can be represented by the configuration of twin impinging jets in a cross-flow. Accurate prediction of this complicated flow field under the Reynolds averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) approach (current practise in industry) is a great challenge as previous studies suggest that some important flow features cannot be captured by the Steady-RANS (SRANS) approach even with a second-order Reynolds stress model (RSM). This paper presents a numerical study of this flow using the Unsteady-RANS (URANS) approach with a RSM and the results clearly indicate that the URANS approach is superior than the SRANS approach but still the predictions of Reynolds stress are not accurate enough.
机译:当垂直/短距起降飞机在地面附近运行时,会形成一个复杂的流场。这种飞机在地面效应中的一个主要问题是,喷气发动机废气中的热气体有可能被吸入并返回发动机,这被称为热气体吸入,这可能会增加进气温度并降低飞机中的氧气含量。进气,有可能导致压缩机失速,低燃烧效率并引起升力的巨大损失。该流场可由横流中的双撞击射流的配置表示。在雷诺平均Navier–Stokes(RANS)方法(行业目前的实践)下,对这种复杂的流场进行准确预测是一个巨大的挑战,因为以前的研究表明,即使是Steady-RANS(SRANS)方法也无法捕获某些重要的流特征使用二阶雷诺应力模型(RSM)。本文使用带有RSM的非稳态RANS(URANS)方法对这种流动进行了数值研究,结果清楚地表明URANS方法优于SRANS方法,但雷诺应力的预测仍然不够准确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号