首页> 外文期刊>Cogent Education >Teaching English or producing docility? Foucauldian analysis of Pakistani state-mandated English textbooks
【24h】

Teaching English or producing docility? Foucauldian analysis of Pakistani state-mandated English textbooks

机译:教英语还是产生顺服?巴基斯坦对国家规定的英语教科书的关注分析

获取原文
       

摘要

The scholarship of language education, particularly with reference to learning and use of English, is marked by varieties of English. One may note two broad models: (1) ENL, ESL, and EFL; (2) EIL, ELF, and WEs. Although the scholarship is replete with debates, the debates seem to only construct and maintain that learning English and its use are neutral activities that earn and equip a learner with certain capital rather than make him/her as such. This paper draws upon Foucault’s theories of discourse and disciplinary power . This paper takes Pakistani state-mandated English textbooks of Grades 1–5 as official documents that contain qualitative data. The qualitative data are analyzed thematically. Two major themes of male body and female body are found which are analyzed and discussed through the Foucauldian lens. The paper holds that learning English and its use perpetuate and produce docility. The paper contends that neither is language a neutral tool nor are its use and learning value-free activities in any of its varieties.
机译:语言教育的奖学金,特别是有关英语学习和使用的奖学金,以英语的多样性为标志。一个人可能会注意到两个广泛的模型:(1)ENL,ESL和EFL; (2)EIL,ELF和WE。尽管奖学金充斥着辩论,但辩论似乎仅构成并坚持认为学习英语及其使用是中立的活动,获得并使学习者拥有一定的资本,而不是使他/她成为这样。本文借鉴了福柯的“话语”和“学科权力”理论。本文将巴基斯坦1-5年级国家规定的英语教科书作为包含定性数据的官方文件。对定性数据进行专题分析。找到了男性身体和女性身体这两个主要主题,并通过福考镜头分析和讨论。本文认为,学习英语及其使用将永久并产生顺服。该论文认为,语言既不是中立的工具,也不是其在任何品种中的使用和学习无价值的活动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号