...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Neuropsychiatry: Journal Of Treatments Evaluation >Identification of specific correlations in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder among different measures
【24h】

Identification of specific correlations in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder among different measures

机译:识别强迫症中不同措施之间的特定相关性

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: Few studies have investigated the convergent validity of assessment methodologies administered to patients with obsessive-compulsive symptoms. None of them, however, report a quantitative analysis of the convergent validity across multiple tools dealing with the diagnosis of Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD). Considering this gap, the aim of this study is to provide useful evidence investigating the correlation among four reporting tools featured by assessment methodologies used with OCD patients. Specifically, it aims at revealing significant correlations between the Symptom Checklist-90-Revision [SCL-90-R], the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory [MMPI-2], the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale [Y-BOCS] and the Padua Inventory Revised [PI-R] in OCD patients. Method: The administered tests include the Symptom Checklist-90-Revision (SCL-90-R), the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI-2), the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) and the Padua Inventory Revised (PI-R). Subjective symptoms assessment and clinical interviews were performed in combination with the evaluation of these tests in 121 patients with OCD. As control groups, we selected 1) a group of depressed patients (N=23) and 2) a group of patients with anxiety disorders (N=54) that underwent the same clinical interviews. Results and conclusions: Results indicate significant correlations between i) two selected scales of the MMPI-2 – in particular the Psychastenia (PT) and Schizophrenia (SC) scales – and those obtained from the SCL-90-R (i.e. obsessivecompulsive symptoms and psychoticism); ii) between the two scales above and the total score of the Y BOCS; iii) between the PT scale (MMPI-2), the obsessive compulsive symptoms scale (SCL-90-R) and the total score of the PIR; iv) between the total score of Y-BOCS and the total score of PI-R. These results confirmed the strong convergent validity among the selected assessment methodologies and lead to a new and integrative clinical approach to diagnose OCD that is pre-screening of OCD symptomatology through reporting measures.
机译:目的:很少有研究调查强迫症患者评估方法的收敛效度。但是,它们都没有报告对处理强迫症(OCD)的多种工具的收敛效度进行定量分析。考虑到这一差距,本研究的目的是提供有用的证据,调查强迫症患者使用的评估方法所具有的四种报告工具之间的相关性。具体而言,它旨在揭示症状清单90修订版[SCL-90-R],明尼苏达州多相性人格问卷[MMPI-2],耶鲁布朗强迫症量表[Y-BOCS]与帕多瓦之间的显着相关性强迫症患者的清单修订[PI-R]。方法:管理的测试包括症状清单90修订版(SCL-90-R),明尼苏达州多相性人格量表(MMPI-2),耶鲁布朗强迫症量表(Y-BOCS)和帕多瓦修订本( PI-R)。主观症状评估和临床访谈与这些测试的评估相结合,对121位强迫症患者进行了评估。作为对照组,我们选择1)一组抑郁症患者(N = 23)和2)一组焦虑症患者(N = 54),他们接受了相同的临床访谈。结果和结论:结果表明,i)两种选定的MMPI-2量表(尤其是Psychastenia(PT)和精神分裂症(SC)量表)与从SCL-90-R获得的量表(即强迫症和精神病)之间存在显着相关性。 ); ii)在上述两个量表与Y BOCS的总分之间; iii)PT量表(MMPI-2),强迫症症状量表(SCL-90-R)和PIR总分之间; iv)在Y-BOCS的总分和PI-R的总分之间。这些结果证实了所选评估方法之间的强收敛性有效性,并导致了一种新的,综合性的诊断OCD的临床方法,即通过报告措施对OCD症状进行预筛选。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号