首页> 外文期刊>Clinics >Effect of minimally invasive percutaneous plates versus interlocking intramedullary nailing in tibial shaft treatment for fractures in adults: A meta-analysis
【24h】

Effect of minimally invasive percutaneous plates versus interlocking intramedullary nailing in tibial shaft treatment for fractures in adults: A meta-analysis

机译:微创经皮钢板与带锁髓内钉在胫骨干治疗成人骨折中的作用:荟萃分析

获取原文
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article was to determine the effects of minimally invasive percutaneous plates versus interlocking intramedullary nailing in the treatment of tibial shaft fractures in adults. METHOD: Literature searches of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, the Chinese Biomedical Literature database, the CNKI database, Wanfang Data, and the Weipu Journal database were performed up to August 2013. Only randomized and quasi-randomized controlled clinical trials comparing the use of percutaneous plates and interlocking intramedullary nails for tibial shaft fractures were included. Data collection and extraction, quality assessment, and data analyses were performed according to the Cochrane standards. RESULTS: Eleven trials were included. Compared with interlocking intramedullary nailing, minimally invasive percutaneous plates shortened fracture healing time and resulted in lower rates of postoperative delayed union and pain. There was no significant difference between the two methods with regard to the rates of excellent and good Johner-Wruh scoring, the rate of reoperation, and other complications. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, insufficient evidence exists regarding the effects of minimally invasive percutaneous plates versus interlocking intramedullary nailing in the treatment of tibial shaft fractures in adults. Low-quality evidence suggests that minimally invasive percutaneous plates could shorten fracture healing time, decrease the rate of postoperative delayed union, and decrease pain levels compared with interlocking intramedullary nailing. There is no significant difference between the two groups in terms of functional recovery scores, reoperation, and other complications. Further research that includes high-quality randomized controlled, multicenter trials is required to compare the effects of minimally invasive percutaneous plates versus interlocking intramedullary nailing in the treatment of tibial shaft fractures in adults.
机译:目的:确定微创经皮钢板与带锁髓内钉治疗成人胫骨干骨折的疗效。方法:截至2013年8月,对Cochrane图书馆,PubMed,EMBASE,中国生物医学文献数据库,CNKI数据库,Wanfang Data和Weipu Journal数据库进行文献检索。仅比较使用的随机和半随机对照临床试验包括经皮钢板和带锁髓内钉治疗胫骨干骨折。数据收集和提取,质量评估和数据分析均根据Cochrane标准进行。结果:包括11个试验。与带锁髓内钉相比,微创经皮钢板可缩短骨折愈合时间,并降低术后延迟愈合和疼痛的发生率。两种方法在出色的Johner-Wruh评分和良好的评分,再手术率以及其他并发症方面均无显着差异。结论:总体而言,关于微创经皮钢板与带锁髓内钉治疗成人胫骨干骨折的疗效相关的证据不足。低质量的证据表明,与带锁髓内钉相比,微创经皮钢板可缩短骨折愈合时间,降低术后延迟愈合的发生率并降低疼痛程度。两组在功能恢复评分,再次手术及其他并发症方面无显着差异。需要进一步的研究,包括高质量的随机对照,多中心试验,以比较微创经皮钢板与带锁髓内钉治疗成人胫骨干骨折的效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号