...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry >Marginal fit of all-ceramic crowns fabricated using two extraoral CAD/CAM systems in comparison with the conventional technique
【24h】

Marginal fit of all-ceramic crowns fabricated using two extraoral CAD/CAM systems in comparison with the conventional technique

机译:与传统技术相比,使用两个口腔CAD / CAM系统制造的全瓷冠的边缘拟合

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of two extraoral computer-aided design (CAD) and computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) systems, in comparison with conventional techniques, on the marginal fit of monolithic CAD/CAM lithium disilicate ceramic crowns. Study design: This is an in vitro interventional study. Place and duration of study: The study was carried out at the Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Prince Sattam Bin Abdul-Aziz University, Saudi Arabia, from December 2015 to April 2016. Methodology: A marginal gap of 60 lithium disilicate crowns was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. In total, 20 pressable lithium disilicate (IPS e.max Press [Ivoclar -Vivadent]) ceramic crowns were fabricated using the conventional lost-wax technique as a control group. The experimental all-ceramic crowns were produced based on a scan stone model and milled using two extraoral CAD/CAM systems: the Cerec group was fabricated using the Cerec CAD/CAM system, and the Trios group was fabricated using Trios CAD and milled using Wieland Zenotec CAM. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Scheffe post hoc test were used for statistical comparison of the groups (α=0.05). Results: The mean (±standard deviation) of the marginal gap of each group was as follows: the Control group was 91.15 (±15.35) μm, the Cerec group was 111.07 (±6.33) μm, and the Trios group was 60.17 (±11.09) μm. One-way ANOVA and the Scheffe post hoc test showed a statistically significant difference in the marginal gap between all groups. Conclusion: It can be concluded from the current study that all-ceramic crowns, fabricated using the CAD/CAM system, show a marginal accuracy that is acceptable in clinical environments. The Trios CAD group displayed the smallest marginal gap.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是确定与常规技术相比,两种口腔计算机辅助设计(CAD)和计算机辅助制造(CAM)系统对单片CAD / CAM二硅酸锂陶瓷的边缘配合的影响冠。研究设计:这是一项体外干预研究。研究的地点和持续时间:该研究于2015年12月至2016年4月在沙特阿拉伯萨塔姆·本·阿卜杜勒·阿齐兹王子大学牙科学院口腔修复学系进行。方法:边缘间隙为60个二硅酸锂冠通过扫描电子显微镜评价。使用常规的失蜡技术作为对照组,总共制作了20个可压制的二硅酸锂(IPS e.max Press [Ivoclar -Vivadent])陶瓷冠。实验全瓷冠是根据扫描石模型生产的,并使用两个口腔CAD / CAM系统进行研磨:使用Cerec CAD / CAM系统制造Cerec组,使用Trios CAD制造Trios组并使用Wieland研磨Zenotec CAM。方差的单向分析(ANOVA)和Scheffe post hoc检验用于各组的统计比较(α= 0.05)。结果:每组边缘间隙的平均值(±标准偏差)如下:对照组为91.15(±15.35)μm,Cerec组为111.07(±6.33)μm,Trios组为60.17(± 11.09)微米。单向方差分析和Scheffe事后检验表明,所有组之间的边际差距在统计学上都存在显着差异。结论:从当前的研究可以得出结论,使用CAD / CAM系统制造的全瓷冠显示的边缘精度在临床环境中是可以接受的。 Trios CAD组显示出最小的边距。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号