...
首页> 外文期刊>ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research >Economic evaluation of obinutuzumab in combination with chlorambucil in first-line treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Spain
【24h】

Economic evaluation of obinutuzumab in combination with chlorambucil in first-line treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Spain

机译:奥比妥珠单抗联合苯丁酸氮芥在西班牙一线治疗慢性淋巴细胞性白血病的经济评价

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of obinutuzumab in combination with chlorambucil (GClb) versus rituximab plus chlorambucil (RClb) in the treatment of adults with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and with comorbidities that make them unsuitable for full-dose fludarabine-based therapy, from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System. Methods: A Markov model was developed with three mutually exclusive health states: progression-free survival (with or without treatment), progression, and death. Survival time for the two treatments was modeled based on the results of CLL11 clinical trial and external sources. Each health state was associated with a utility value and direct medical costs. The utilities were obtained from a utility elicitation study conducted in the UK. Costs and general background mortality data were obtained from published Spanish sources. Deterministic and probabilistic analyses were conducted, with a time frame of 20 years. The health outcomes were measured as life years (LYs) gained and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. Efficiency was measured as the cost per LY or per QALY gained of the most effective regimen. Results: In the deterministic base case analysis, each patient treated with GClb resulted in 0.717 LYs gained and 0.673 QALYs gained versus RClb. The cost per LY and per QALY gained with GClb versus RClb was €23,314 and €24,838, respectively. The results proved stable in most of the univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses, with a probabilistic cost per QALY gained of €24,734 (95% confidence interval: €21,860–28,367). Conclusion: Using GClb to treat patients with previously untreated CLL for whom full-dose fludarabine-based therapy is unsuitable allows significant gains in terms of LYs and QALYs versus treatment with RClb. Treatment with GClb versus RClb can be regarded as efficient when considered the willingness to pay thresholds commonly used in Spain.
机译:目的:评估奥比妥珠单抗联合苯丁酸氮芥(GClb)与利妥昔单抗加苯丁酸氮芥(RClb)联合治疗成人未经治疗的慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)及其合并症使其不适合全剂量氟达拉滨的成本效益从西班牙国家卫生系统的角度看,这种基于治疗的疗法。方法:建立了具有三个相互排斥的健康状态的Markov模型:无进展生存期(接受或不接受治疗),进展和死亡。两种治疗的生存时间均根据CLL11临床试验和外部来源的结果进行建模。每个健康状态都与效用价值和直接医疗费用相关。该实用程序是从英国进行的实用程序启发研究获得的。费用和一般背景死亡率数据来自西班牙出版的出版物。进行了确定性和概率分析,时间框架为20年。健康结局通过获得的生命年(LYs)和获得的质量调整生命年(QALYs)进行衡量。效率以最有效方案的每LY或QALY的成本来衡量。结果:在确定性基础病例分析中,每位接受GClb治疗的患者与RClb相比,获得了0.717 LY和0.673 QALY。 GClb与RClb相比,每个LY和每个QALY的成本分别为23,314欧元和24,838欧元。在大多数单变量和概率敏感性分析中,结果都证明是稳定的,每个QALY的概率成本为24,734欧元(95%置信区间:21,860-28,367欧元)。结论:使用GClb来治疗以前未接受过CLL治疗的患者,这些患者不适合全剂量氟达拉滨治疗,与RClb相比,LYs和QALYs显着增加。考虑到西班牙通常愿意支付的阈值,用GClb和RClb进行治疗可以被认为是有效的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号