首页> 外文期刊>ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research >Economic evaluation of alternative assisted reproduction techniques in management of infertility in Greece
【24h】

Economic evaluation of alternative assisted reproduction techniques in management of infertility in Greece

机译:在希腊不育症治疗中替代辅助生殖技术的经济评估

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare Gonal-F?, a recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone, with (Menopur?), a highly purified human menopausal gonadotrophin (hpHMG) in assisted reproduction in Greece. Methods: A decision tree in combination with a Markov model was used to assess the clinical and economical impact of comparators for up to three consecutive cycles. Transition probabilities were derived from the literature and validated by clinical experts. Cost components were derived from the electronic databases of selected private and public clinics. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed to deal with uncertainty and to construct a cost-effectiveness acceptability curve. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in favor of the recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone arm compared with hpHMG, which was associated with 52 more births (95% uncertainty interval 26–78, P = 0.001) per 1000 patients. The cost per birth was estimated at €16,906 and €17,286 in the recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and hpHMG arms, respectively. The cost per in vitro fertilization was estimated at €4365 in the recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone arm and €3815 in the hpHMG arm, indicating a difference of €550. The incremental cost per birth for recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone versus hpHMG was estimated at €14,540, while the incremental cost per life-year was estimated at €175.41. Conclusion: Recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone may represent a cost-effective choice compared with hpHMG when used for ovarian stimulation for a pharmacoeconomic point of view in the Greek public health care setting. However, it must be noted that in clinical practice both agents may be used together to increase the number of follicles, oocytes, embryos, and/or pregnancies in treated patients, an approach which has not been evaluated in Greece or reported in the literature due to obvious limitations.
机译:背景:本研究的目的是比较重组卵泡刺激激素Gonal-Fα和高度纯化的人绝经期促性腺激素(hpHMG)(Menopur?)在希腊的辅助生殖。方法:决策树与马尔可夫模型相结合被用于评估比较器的临床和经济影响,连续三个周期。转移概率从文献中得出,并由临床专家验证。费用构成部分来自选定的私人和公共诊所的电子数据库。进行了概率敏感性分析,以处理不确定性并构建成本效益可接受性曲线。结果:与hpHMG相比,重组卵泡刺激激素组在统计学上有显着差异,每1000例患者中有52例出生(95%不确定区间26-78,P = 0.001)。重组卵泡刺激激素和hpHMG臂的平均出生成本分别为16906欧元和17286欧元。重组卵泡刺激素组的体外受精成本估计为4365欧元,hpHMG组为3815欧元,表明相差550欧元。重组卵泡刺激素与hpHMG相比,每出生的增量成本估计为14,540欧元,而每生命年的增量成本估计为175.41欧元。结论:在希腊公共卫生机构中,从药物经济学的角度来看,重组促卵泡激素与hpHMG相比,可用于卵巢刺激,是一种经济有效的选择。但是,必须注意的是,在临床实践中,两种药物可一起使用以增加治疗患者的卵泡,卵母细胞,胚胎和/或怀孕的数量,该方法尚未在希腊进行评估或在文献中已有报道。有明显的局限性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号