首页> 外文期刊>Clinical ophthalmology >Preference for a fixed combination of brinzolamide/timolol versus dorzolamide/ timolol among patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
【24h】

Preference for a fixed combination of brinzolamide/timolol versus dorzolamide/ timolol among patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension

机译:开角型青光眼或高眼压症患者首选固定使用苯佐酰胺/替莫洛与多佐胺/替莫洛的固定组合

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: To assess ocular discomfort upon instillation and patient preference for brinzolamide/timolol relative to dorzolamide/timolol, in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.Methods: This was a multicenter, prospective, patient-masked, randomized, crossover study. On day 0, patients received one drop of brinzolamide/timolol in one eye and one drop of dorzolamide/timolol in the contralateral eye. On day 1, patients were randomly assigned to receive one drop of either brinzolamide/timolol or dorzolamide/timolol in both eyes; on day 2, patients received one drop of the alternate treatment in both eyes. Measures included a patient preference question on day 2 (primary) and mean ocular discomfort scale scores on days 1 and 2 (secondary). Safety assessments included adverse events, visual acuity, and slit-lamp examinations.Results: Of 120 patients who enrolled, 115 completed the study. Of these, 112 patients instilled both medications and expressed a study medication preference on day 2. A significantly greater percentage preferred brinzolamide/timolol to dorzolamide/timolol (67.0% versus 30.4%; P < 0.001). The ocular discomfort (expressed as mean [standard deviation]) with brinzolamide/timolol was significantly lower than with dorzolamide/timolol (day 2: 1.9 [2.3] versus 3.7 [2.8], respectively [P = 0.0003]; both days combined: 2.1 [2.5] versus 3.5 [2.9], respectively [P = 0.00014]). On day 1, five patients receiving brinzolamide/timolol reported five nonserious adverse events (AEs): flu (n = 1), bitter taste (n = 2), and headache (n = 2). Four events, bitter taste (two events) and headache (two events), were considered related to brinzolamide/timolol. Events were mild in intensity, except bitter taste of moderate intensity reported by one patient. No AEs were reported at day 2. All AEs resolved without additional treatment. No clinically relevant changes from baseline were observed in best-corrected visual acuity or slit-lamp examinations of ocular signs.Conclusion: Patients had less discomfort with brinzolamide/timolol than with dorzolamide/timolol, and more expressed a preference for brinzolamide/timolol. Both treatments were generally safe and well tolerated.
机译:目的:评估开角型青光眼或高眼压患者的滴注时眼部不适以及患者相对于多佐胺/替莫洛尔的苯丙氨酰胺/替莫洛尔的偏爱。方法:这是一项多中心,前瞻性,患者掩盖,随机,交叉研究。在第0天,患者在一只眼中接受一滴溴苯甲酰胺/噻吗洛尔,在对侧眼中接受一滴多佐胺/噻吗洛尔。在第1天,将患者随机分配至双眼接受一滴布林酰胺/替莫洛或多佐胺/替莫洛治疗;在第2天,双眼患者接受一滴替代治疗。措施包括第2天(主要)的患者偏爱问题和第1天和第2天(次要)的平均眼部不适量表评分。安全性评估包括不良事件,视敏度和裂隙灯检查。结果:在120名患者中,有115名完成了研究。在这些患者中,有112名患者在第2天输注了两种药物并表示对研究药物的偏爱。相对于多佐胺/替莫洛尔,首选苯佐酰胺/替莫洛尔的比例明显更高(67.0%对30.4%; P <0.001)。苯佐酰胺/噻吗洛尔的眼部不适(表示为平均[标准差])显着低于多佐胺/噻吗洛尔(分别为2天:1.9 [2.3]和3.7 [2.8])[P = 0.0003];两天合计:2.1分别为[2.5]和3.5 [2.9] [P = 0.00014])。在第1天,有5名接受布林酰胺/噻吗洛尔的患者报告了5种严重的不良事件(AE):流感(n = 1),苦味(n = 2)和头痛(n = 2)。认为有四个事件,即苦味(两个事件)和头痛(两个事件)与布林酰胺/噻吗洛尔有关。除一名患者报告的中等强度的苦味外,其他事件的强度均为轻度。在第2天未报告任何AE。所有AE无需进一步治疗即可解决。最佳矫正视力或裂隙灯检查对眼部症状没有观察到临床上与基线相关的变化。两种治疗方法通常都是安全的并且耐受性良好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号