首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Epidemiology >The criterion validity of the web-based Major Depression Inventory when used on clinical suspicion of depression in primary care
【24h】

The criterion validity of the web-based Major Depression Inventory when used on clinical suspicion of depression in primary care

机译:基于网络的主要抑郁量调查表在基层医疗中临床怀疑抑郁时的标准有效性

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: The Major Depression Inventory (MDI) is widely used in Danish general practice as a screening tool to assess depression in symptomatic patients. Nevertheless, no validation studies of the MDI have been performed. The aim of this study was to validate the web-based version of the MDI against a fully structured telephone interview in a population selected on clinical suspicion of depression (ie, presence of two or three core symptoms of depression) in general practice. Materials and methods: General practitioners (GPs) invited consecutive persons suspected of depression to complete the web-based MDI in a primary care setting. The validation was based on the Munich-Composite International Diagnostic Interview (M-CIDI) by phone. GPs in the 22 practices in our study included 132 persons suspected of depression. Depression was rated as yeso according to the MDI and M-CIDI. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) algorithms of the MDI were examined. Results: According to the M-CIDI interview, 87.9% of the included population was depressed and 64.4% was severely depressed. According to the MDI scale, 59.1% of the population was depressed and 31.8% was severely depressed. The sensitivity of the MDI for depression was 62.1% (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 52.6–70.9) and the specificity was 62.5% (95% CI: 35.4–84.8). The sensitivity for severe depression was 42.2% (95% CI: 30.6–52.4) and the specificity was 85.1% (95% CI: 71.7–93.8). The receiver operating curve showed an area under the curve of 0.66 (95% CI: 0.52–0.81) for any depression and of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.63–0.81) for severe depression. Conclusion: The MDI is a conservative instrument for diagnosing ICD-10 depression in a clinical setting compared to the M-CIDI interview. Only a few false-positive diagnoses were identified when the MDI was used on clinical suspicion of depression.
机译:背景:主要抑郁量表(MDI)在丹麦的一般实践中广泛用作评估有症状患者抑郁症的筛查工具。但是,尚未进行MDI的验证研究。这项研究的目的是针对在临床上普遍怀疑患有抑郁症(即存在两种或三种抑郁症的主要症状)的人群中,针对完全结构化的电话采访来验证MDI的基于Web的版本。材料和方法:全科医生(GPs)邀请了连续不断的疑似抑郁症患者在基层医疗机构中完成基于网络的MDI。验证基于电话进行的慕尼黑综合国际诊断访谈(M-CIDI)。在我们研究的22个实践中,全科医生包括132名涉嫌抑郁的人。根据MDI和M-CIDI,抑郁症的评分为是/否。对MDI的国际疾病分类第十次修订(ICD-10)算法的敏感性,特异性和阳性预测值进行了检查。结果:根据M-CIDI访谈,所包括的人群中有87.9%的人处于抑郁状态,而严重抑郁的人占64.4%。根据MDI量表,59.1%的人口处于抑郁状态,而31.8%的人口处于严重抑郁状态。 MDI对抑郁症的敏感性为62.1%(95%置信区间[95%CI]:52.6-70.9),特异性为62.5%(95%CI:35.4-84.8)。严重抑郁的敏感性为42.2%(95%CI:30.6–52.4),特异性为85.1%(95%CI:71.7–93.8)。接收者的工作曲线显示,对于任何抑郁症,曲线下方的面积为0.66(95%CI:0.52-0.81),对于严重抑郁症,其曲线下方的面积为0.72(95%CI:0.63-0.81)。结论:与M-CIDI访谈相比,MDI在临床环境中是诊断ICD-10抑郁症的保守手段。当MDI用于临床怀疑抑郁时,只有少数假阳性诊断。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号