...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of psychosomatic research >The construct validity of the Major Depression Inventory: A Rasch analysis of a self-rating scale in primary care
【24h】

The construct validity of the Major Depression Inventory: A Rasch analysis of a self-rating scale in primary care

机译:重大抑郁库存构建有效性:初级保健中自评规模的Rasch分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Abstract Objective We aimed to assess the measurement properties of the ten-item Major Depression Inventory when used on clinical suspicion in general practice by performing a Rasch analysis. Methods General practitioners asked consecutive persons to respond to the web-based Major Depression Inventory on clinical suspicion of depression. We included 22 practices and 245 persons. Rasch analysis was performed using RUMM2030 software. The Rasch model fit suggests that all items contribute to a single underlying trait (defined as internal construct validity). Mokken analysis was used to test dimensionality and scalability. Results Our Rasch analysis showed misfit concerning the sleep and appetite items (items 9 and 10). The response categories were disordered for eight items. After modifying the original six-point to a four-point scoring system for all items, we achieved ordered response categories for all ten items. The person separation reliability was acceptable (0.82) for the initial model. Dimensionality testing did not support combining the ten items to create a total score. The scale appeared to be well targeted to this clinical sample. No significant differential item functioning was observed for gender, age, work status and education. The Rasch and Mokken analyses revealed two dimensions, but the Major Depression Inventory showed fit to one scale if items 9 and 10 were excluded. Conclusion Our study indicated scalability problems in the current version of the Major Depression Inventory. The conducted analysis revealed better statistical fit when items 9 and 10 were excluded. Highlights ? We studied the construct validity of the Major Depression Inventory (MDI) with modern test theory; Rasch model and Mokken analysis. ? Our large population-based study indicated that the current version of the MDI has scalability problems. ? An analysis revealed better fit for a two-dimensional than a unidimensional model.
机译:摘要目的我们旨在通过进行Rasch分析,在一般实践中使用时评估十件主抑郁症库存的测量性质。方法普通从业者要求连续人员响应基于网络的主要抑郁症库存,临床怀疑抑郁症。我们包括22个实践和245人。使用RUMM2030软件进行RASCH分析。 Rasch模型拟合表明所有项目都有助于单个潜在特征(定义为内部构建有效性)。 Mokken分析用于测试维度和可扩展性。结果我们的RASCH分析显示出睡眠和食欲项目的缺陷率(项目9和10)。响应类别持续八个项目。修改原始六点到所有项目的四点评分系统后,我们为所有十个项目实现了有序的响应类别。初始模型可接受分离可靠性(0.82)。维度测试不支持组合十个项目创建总分。该阶段似乎是临床样本的良好靶向。对于性别,年龄,工作地位和教育,没有观察到明显的差异项目。 Rasch和Mokken分析揭示了两种维度,但如果排除项目9和10,则主要抑郁库存如果排除项目9和10,则拟合到一个比例。结论我们的研究表明了当前版本的主要抑郁库存中的可扩展性问题。当排除项目9和10时,进行的分析显示出更好的统计拟合。强调 ?我们研究了具有现代测试理论的主要抑郁库存(MDI)的构建有效性; Rasch模型和Mokken分析。还我们基于大型人口的研究表明,目前的MDI版本具有可扩展性问题。还分析显示,比单向模型更好地适合二维。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号