首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Medicine Insights: Reproductive Health >Comparison between Cleavage Stage versus Blastocyst Stage Embryo Transfer in an Egyptian Cohort Undergoing in vitro Fertilization: A Possible Role for Laser Assisted Hatching
【24h】

Comparison between Cleavage Stage versus Blastocyst Stage Embryo Transfer in an Egyptian Cohort Undergoing in vitro Fertilization: A Possible Role for Laser Assisted Hatching

机译:埃及队列进行体外受精的卵裂期和胚泡期胚胎移植之间的比较:激光辅助孵化的可能作用

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Extended in vitro embryo culture and blastocyst transfer have emerged as essential components of the advanced reproductive technology armamentarium, permitting selection of more advanced embryos considered best suited for transfer. Aim of study: The aim of this study was to compare between cleavage stage and blastocyst stage embryo transfer in patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection, and to assess the role of assisted hatching technique in patients undergoing blastocyst transfer. Patients and methods: This study was carried out on two groups. Group I: 110 patients who underwent 120 cycles of intracytoplasmic sperm injection with day 2–3 embryo transfer—for unexplained infertility or male factor within the previous 3 years. Their data obtained retrospectively from medical records. Group II: 46 age matched infertile female patients undergoing 51 intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles for similar causes. Patients in Group II were further subdivided into 2 equal subgroups; Group IIa (23 patients), which had laser assisted hatching and Group IIb (23 patients), which did not have assisted hatching. All patients had an infertility workup including basal hormonal profile, pelvic ultrasound, hysterosalpingogram and/or laparoscope and semen analysis of the patient’s partner. All patients underwent controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: Using long protocol of ovulation induction. Laser assisted hatching was done for blastocysts of 23 patients. Results: Comparison between both groups as regards the reproductive outcome showed a significant difference in pregnancy and implantation rates, both being higher in group II (P < 0.05) Comparison between both subgroups as regards the reproductive outcome showed a highly significant difference in pregnancy and implantation rates, both being higher in Group IIa (P < 0.01). There was also a significantly higher rate of multiple pregnancies among Group IIa (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Blastocyst transfer is a successful and improved alternative for patients with multiple failed in vitro fertilization attempts, associated with a significant increase in pregnancy and implantation rates. Furthermore, laser assisted hatching increases implantation and clinical pregnancy rates.
机译:背景:扩展的体外胚胎培养和胚泡转移已成为先进生殖技术武器库的重要组成部分,从而允许选择更适合转移的更高级胚胎。研究目的:本研究的目的是比较胞浆内精子注射患者的卵裂期和囊胚期胚胎移植之间的差异,并评估辅助孵化技术在囊胚移植患者中的作用。患者和方法:本研究分为两组。第一组:110例患者,在过去3年内因无法解释的不育症或男性因素,接受了120个周期的胞浆内单精子注射并进行了2-3天胚胎移植。他们的数据是从医疗记录中追溯获得的。第二组:46名年龄相匹配的不育女性患者,由于相似的原因而接受了51个胞浆内精子注射周期。第二组患者被进一步细分为两个相等的亚组。激光辅助孵化的IIa组(23例患者)和没有辅助孵化的IIb组(23例)。所有患者均进行了不育检查,包括基础荷尔蒙状况,骨盆超声检查,子宫输卵管造影和/或腹腔镜检查以及患者伴侣的精液分析。所有患者均接受了控制性的卵巢过度刺激:使用长期排卵诱导方案。激光辅助孵化的23例囊胚。结果:两组之间在生殖结局方面的比较显示怀孕和着床率均存在显着差异,而第二组均较高(P <0.05)。率,在IIa组中均较高(P <0.01)。 IIa组中多次妊娠的比率也显着较高(P <0.05)。结论:对于多次体外受精尝试失败的患者,胚泡移植是成功且改进的替代方法,可显着增加妊娠率和着床率。此外,激光辅助孵化会增加植入率和临床妊娠率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号