首页> 外文期刊>Clinics >A comparison of epidural anesthesia and lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks for knee surgery
【24h】

A comparison of epidural anesthesia and lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks for knee surgery

机译:硬膜外麻醉与腰丛神经坐骨神经阻滞在膝关节手术中的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: The efficacy of combined lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks was compared to epidural anesthesia in patients undergoing total knee surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 80 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status I-III patients (age range 18 to 65) undergoing knee surgery. The patients were randomly divided into one of two groups. Epidural anesthesia was performed in the epidural anesthesia (EA) group (n=40), and the lumbar plexus and sciatic nerves were blockedin the lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks (LPSB) group (n=40). For each patient, onset of sensory and motor block, degree of motor block, sign of sensory block in the contralateral lower limb for the lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks group, success in providing adequate anesthesia, hemodynamic changes, time of first analgesic request, and patient and surgeon satisfaction with the anesthetic technique were recorded. RESULTS: One patient in the epidural anesthesia group and three patients in the lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks group required general anesthesia due to failed block. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding the success of providing adequate anesthesia. Eight patients in the lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks group developed contralateral spread. The onset of sensory-motor block and the time of the first analgesic request were significantly later in the lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks group than in the epidural anesthesia group. Although there were no significant differences regarding patient satisfaction with the anesthetic technique between the two groups, surgeon satisfaction was significantly higher in the lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks group than in the epidural anesthesia group. CONCLUSION: The lumbar plexus -sciatic nerve blocks provide effective unilateral anesthesia and may offer a beneficial alternative to epidural anesthesia in patients undergoing total knee surgery.
机译:目的:比较接受全膝关节手术的患者的腰丛-坐骨神经阻滞联合硬膜外麻醉的疗效。患者与方法:该研究包括80名接受了膝关节手术的美国麻醉医师学会(ASA)身体状况I-III患者(年龄18至65)。将患者随机分为两组。硬膜外麻醉(EA)组(n = 40)进行硬膜外麻醉,腰丛-坐骨神经阻滞(LPSB)组(n = 40)阻塞腰丛和坐骨神经。对于每位患者,感觉神经和运动阻滞的发作,运动阻滞的程度,对侧下肢的腰丛神经-坐骨神经阻滞组的感觉阻滞的体征,成功提供足够的麻醉,血流动力学变化,首次镇痛的时间,记录患者和外科医生对麻醉技术的满意度。结果:硬膜外麻醉组的一名患者和腰丛神经-坐骨神经阻滞组的三名患者因阻滞失败而需要全身麻醉。两组在提供足够麻醉的成功率方面没有显着差异。腰丛神经-坐骨神经阻滞组中的八名患者发生了对侧扩散。腰丛神经-坐骨神经阻滞组的感觉运动阻滞的发作和首次镇痛的时间明显比硬膜外麻醉组晚。尽管两组患者对麻醉技术的满意度没有显着差异,但腰丛神经-坐骨神经阻滞组的手术满意度明显高于硬膜外麻醉组。结论:腰丛神经-坐骨神经阻滞提供有效的单侧麻醉,并可能为全膝关节手术患者提供硬膜外麻醉的替代选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号