首页> 外文期刊>Clinical ophthalmology >Anti-VEGF treatment of diabetic macular edema in clinical practice: effectiveness and patterns of use (ECHO Study Report 1)
【24h】

Anti-VEGF treatment of diabetic macular edema in clinical practice: effectiveness and patterns of use (ECHO Study Report 1)

机译:临床实践中抗VEGF治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿:有效性和使用方式(ECHO研究报告1)

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and injection frequency of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors as used in clinical practice for the treatment of diabetic macular edema. Methods: Multicenter (10 sites), retrospective chart review in patients (n=156) who received ≥3 anti-VEGF injections. Data collected for ≥6?months after the first injection included Snellen best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) by time-domain or spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (TD-OCT or SD-OCT). Results: Mean number of anti-VEGF injections (627 bevacizumab, 594 ranibizumab, 1 aflibercept) was 5.8 (year 1), 5.0 (year 2), and 3.4 (year 3). Percentage of patients with BCVA of 20/40 or better and CRT ≤250?μm on TD-OCT or ≤300?μm on SD-OCT at the same visit (primary endpoint) ranged from 16.4% to 38.9% after the first 10 injections; 51.9%–62.3% achieved ≥20/40 BCVA and 26.2%–48.0% met CRT criteria. Therapy was well tolerated with 19 treatment-related adverse events (all ocular) reported. Conclusion: Anti-VEGF injections were administered less frequently and were less effective than those in the ranibizumab registration trials. After each of the first 9 injections, <25% of patients achieved both BCVA of 20/40 or better and a dry macula. A substantial proportion of patients are suboptimal responders to anti-VEGF therapy; these patients may be candidates for other therapies, including intravitreal corticosteroid and laser therapy.
机译:目的:评价在临床实践中用于治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)抑制剂的疗效,安全性和注射频率。方法:对接受≥3次抗VEGF注射的患者(n = 156)进行多中心(10个位点)回顾性图表审查。第一次注射后≥6个月收集的数据包括通过时域或谱域光学相干断层扫描(TD-OCT或SD-OCT)进行的Snellen最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和视网膜中央厚度(CRT)。结果:抗VEGF注射剂的平均数(627贝伐单抗,594雷珠单抗,1阿柏西普)分别为5.8(第1年),5.0(第2年)和3.4(第3年)。在初次注射10次后,在同一次就诊(主要终点)时BCVA为20/40或更高且CRT≤TD-OCT≤250μm或SD-OCT≤300μμm的患者百分比范围为16.4%至38.9% ;达到≥20/ 40 BCVA的占51.9%–62.3%,符合CRT标准的占26.2%–48.0%。据报道,该疗法对19种治疗相关不良事件(全眼)的耐受性良好。结论:与兰尼单抗注册试验相比,抗VEGF注射的频率较低且效果较差。在前9次注射中的每一次注射后,<25%的患者的BCVA和干黄斑均达到20/40或更高。很大一部分患者对抗VEGF治疗的反应欠佳。这些患者可能是其他疗法的候选者,包括玻璃体内糖皮质激素和激光疗法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号