...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Epidemiology >Optimal timing of complete revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: a pairwise and network meta-analysis
【24h】

Optimal timing of complete revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: a pairwise and network meta-analysis

机译:ST段抬高型心肌梗死和多支血管病变患者完全血运重建的最佳时机:成对和网络荟萃分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction: The optimal revascularization strategy for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease is unclear. In this study, we performed a meta-analysis to determine the optimal revascularization strategy for treating these patients. Methods: Searches of PubMed, the Cochrane Library, clinicaltrial.gov, and the reference lists of relevant papers were performed covering the period between the year 2000 and March 20, 2017. A pairwise analysis and a Bayesian network meta-analysis were performed to compare the effectiveness of early complete revascularization (CR) during the index hospitalization, delayed CR, and culprit only revascularization (COR). The primary endpoint was the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), which were defined as the composite of recurrent myocardial infarction (MI), repeat revascularization, and all-cause mortality. The secondary endpoints were the rates of all-cause mortality, recurrent MI, and repeat revascularization. This study is registered at PROSPERO under registration number CRD42017059980. Results: Eleven randomized controlled trials including a total of 3,170 patients were identified. A pairwise meta-analysis showed that compared with COR, early CR was associated with significantly decreased risks of MACE (relative risk [RR] 0.47, 95% CI 0.39–0.56), MI (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.37–0.83), and repeat revascularization (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.27–0.46) but not of all-cause mortality (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.52–1.16). These results were confirmed by trial sequential analysis. The network meta-analysis showed that early CR had the highest probability of being the first treatment option during MACE (89.2%), MI (83.3%), and repeat revascularization (80.4%). Conclusion: Early CR during the index hospitalization was markedly superior to COR with respect to reducing the risk of MACE, as CR significantly decreased the risks of MI and repeat revascularization compared with COR. However, further study is warranted to determine whether CR during the index hospitalization can improve survival in patients with concurrent ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease. The optimal timing of CR remains inconclusive considering the small number of studies and patients included in the analysis comparing early and delayed CR.
机译:简介:ST段抬高型心肌梗塞和多支血管疾病患者的最佳血运重建策略尚不清楚。在这项研究中,我们进行了荟萃分析,以确定治疗这些患者的最佳血运重建策略。方法:对2000年至2017年3月之间的PubMed,Cochrane图书馆,clinicaltrial.gov以及相关论文的参考文献清单进行检索。进行了成对分析和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析,以进行比较指标住院期间早期完全血运重建(CR)的效果,延迟的CR和仅因罪犯进行血运重建(COR)的有效性。主要终点是主要不良心脏事件(MACE)的发生率,其定义为复发性心肌梗塞(MI),重复血运重建和全因死亡率的复合物。次要终点是全因死亡率,MI复发和再次血运重建的发生率。该研究已在PROSPERO注册,注册号为CRD42017059980。结果:确定了11项随机对照试验,包括3170例患者。配对荟萃分析显示,与COR相比,早期CR与MACE的风险显着降低(相对风险[RR] 0.47,95%CI 0.39-0.56),MI(RR 0.55,95%CI 0.37-0.83),并再次进行血运重建(RR 0.35,95%CI 0.27–0.46),但并非全因死亡率(RR 0.78,95%CI 0.52-1.16)。这些结果通过试验顺序分析得到证实。网络荟萃分析显示,早期CR在MACE(89.2%),MI(83.3%)和重复血运重建(80.4%)期间成为首选治​​疗方案的可能性最高。结论:在指标住院期间,早期CR在降低MACE风险方面明显优于COR,因为与COR相比,CR显着降低了MI风险和重复血运重建的风险。但是,有必要进行进一步的研究来确定指数住院期间的CR是否可以改善并发ST段抬高型心肌梗塞和多支血管疾病的患者的生存率。考虑到少量研究和比较早期和延迟CR的患者,CR的最佳时机仍未定论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号