首页> 外文期刊>Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports >Comparisons of Buckling Capacity Curves of Pressurized Spheres with EDR Provisions and Experimental Results
【24h】

Comparisons of Buckling Capacity Curves of Pressurized Spheres with EDR Provisions and Experimental Results

机译:带EDR规定的压球屈曲能力曲线比较及实验结果

获取原文
       

摘要

Existing provisions leading to the assessment of the buckling resistance of pressurised spherical shells were published in the European Design Recommendations (EDR) [1]. This book comprises rules which refer to the stability of steel shells of different shapes. In the first step of the general procedure they require calculation of two reference quantities: the elastic critical buckling reference pRcr and the plastic reference resistance pRpl. These quantities should be determined in the linear buckling analysis (LBA) and in the materially nonlinear analysis (MNA) respectively. Only in the case of spherical shells the existing procedure has exceptional character. It is based on the geometrically nonlinear analysis (GNA) and on the geometrically and materially nonlinear analysis (GMNA), respectively. From this reason, in this particular case there was a need to change the existing approach. The new procedure was presented in the work of B?a?ejewski & Marcinowski in 2016 (comp. [2]). All steps of the procedure leading to the assessment of buckling resistance of pressurized steel, spherical shells were presented in this work. The elaborated procedure is consistent with provisions of Eurocode EN1993-1-6 (comp. [3]) and with recommendations inserted in Europeans Design Recommendations [1]. The proposed capacity curves were compared with existing proposal published in [1] for three different fabrication quality classes predicted in [3]. In this work also comparisons of author’s proposals with experimental results obtained by other authors were presented.
机译:在欧洲设计建议书(EDR)[1]中发布​​了导致评估加压球形壳体的抗屈曲性的现有规定。本书包含一些规则,这些规则涉及不同形状的钢壳的稳定性。在通用过程的第一步中,它们需要计算两个参考量:弹性临界屈曲参考pRcr和塑性参考电阻pRpl。这些量应分别在线性屈曲分析(LBA)和材料非线性分析(MNA)中确定。仅在球壳的情况下,现有程序才具有出色的性能。它分别基于几何非线性分析(GNA)和几何与材料非线性分析(GMNA)。因此,在这种特殊情况下,需要更改现有方法。 B?a?ejewski和Marcinowski在2016年的工作中提出了新程序(比较[2])。在这项工作中介绍了导致评估加压钢,球形壳的抗屈曲性的所有步骤。详细的程序与欧洲规范EN1993-1-6(比较[3])的规定以及《欧洲人设计建议书》 [1]中插入的建议一致。对于[3]中预测的三种不同的制造质量等级,将建议的容量曲线与[1]中发布​​的现有建议进行了比较。在这项工作中,还比较了作者的提议和其他作者获得的实验结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号