首页> 外文期刊>Clinical and vaccine immunology: CVI >Inter- and Intralaboratory Comparison of JC Polyomavirus Antibody Testing Using Two Different Virus-Like Particle-Based Assays
【24h】

Inter- and Intralaboratory Comparison of JC Polyomavirus Antibody Testing Using Two Different Virus-Like Particle-Based Assays

机译:使用两种不同的基于病毒的基于粒子的分析方法对JC多瘤病毒抗体进行实验室间和实验室内比较

获取原文
           

摘要

JC polyomavirus (JCPyV) can cause progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), a debilitating, often fatal brain disease in immunocompromised patients. JCPyV-seropositive multiple sclerosis (MS) patients treated with natalizumab have a 2- to 10-fold increased risk of developing PML. Therefore, JCPyV serology has been recommended for PML risk stratification. However, different antibody tests may not be equivalent. To study intra- and interlaboratory variability, sera from 398 healthy blood donors were compared in 4 independent enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) measurements generating >1,592 data points. Three data sets (Basel1, Basel2, and Basel3) used the same basic protocol but different JCPyV virus-like particle (VLP) preparations and introduced normalization to a reference serum. The data sets were also compared with an independent method using biotinylated VLPs (Helsinki1). VLP preadsorption reducing ≥35% activity was used to identify seropositive sera. The results indicated that Basel1, Basel2, Basel3, and Helsinki1 were similar regarding overall data distribution (P = 0.79) and seroprevalence (58.0, 54.5, 54.8, and 53.5%, respectively; P = 0.95). However, intra-assay intralaboratory comparison yielded 3.7% to 12% discordant results, most of which were close to the cutoff (0.080 < optical density [OD] < 0.250) according to Bland-Altman analysis. Introduction of normalization improved overall performance and reduced discordance. The interlaboratory interassay comparison between Basel3 and Helsinki1 revealed only 15 discordant results, 14 (93%) of which were close to the cutoff. Preadsorption identified specificities of 99.44% and 97.78% and sensitivities of 99.54% and 95.87% for Basel3 and Helsinki1, respectively. Thus, normalization to a preferably WHO-approved reference serum, duplicate testing, and preadsorption for samples around the cutoff may be necessary for reliable JCPyV serology and PML risk stratification.
机译:JC多瘤病毒(JCPyV)可以引起进行性多灶性白质脑病(PML),在免疫功能低下的患者中,它使人衰弱,常常致命。用那他珠单抗治疗的JCPyV血清阳性多发性硬化症(MS)患者患PML的风险增加了2到10倍。因此,已建议将JCPyV血清学用于PML风险分层。但是,不同的抗体测试可能并不等效。为了研究实验室内和实验室间的变异性,在4个独立的酶联免疫测定(ELISA)测量中比较了398名健康献血者的血清,产生了超过1,592个数据点。三个数据集(Basel1,Basel2和Basel3)使用相同的基本协议,但使用了不同的JCPyV病毒样颗粒(VLP)制剂,并引入了对参考血清的标准化。还将数据集与使用生物素化VLP(Helsinki1)的独立方法进行比较。使用VLP预吸附降低活性≥35%来鉴定血清反应阳性血清。结果表明,Basel1,Basel2,Basel3和Helsinki1在总体数据分布( P = 0.79)和血清阳性率(58.0、54.5、54.8和53.5%)方面相似; P < / em> = 0.95)。然而,根据Bland-Altman分析,测定内实验室内比较得出3.7%至12%不一致的结果,其中大部分接近临界值(0.080 <光学密度[OD] <0.250)。引入规范化改善了整体性能并减少了不一致。巴塞尔协议(Basel3)与赫尔辛基(Helsinki1)之间的实验室间比对分析显示,只有15个不一致的结果,其中14个(93%)接近临界值。 Preadsorption对Basel3和Helsinki1的特异性分别为99.44%和97.78%,敏感性为99.54%和95.87%。因此,为了获得可靠的JCPyV血清学和PML风险分层,可能需要对经WHO批准的参考血清进行标准化,重复测试以及对截止值附近的样品进行预吸附。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号