...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Interventions in Aging >Estimating glomerular filtration rates in elderly Chinese patients with chronic kidney disease: performance of six modified formulae developed in Asian populations
【24h】

Estimating glomerular filtration rates in elderly Chinese patients with chronic kidney disease: performance of six modified formulae developed in Asian populations

机译:估计中国老年慢性肾脏病患者的肾小球滤过率:亚洲人群开发的六种改良配方的性能

获取原文

摘要

Objectives: The aim of the present study was to evaluate modified glomerular filtration rate (GFR) prediction formulae in an elderly Chinese population with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods: A total of 378 elderly Chinese patients with CKD were enrolled. The GFR was estimated with six modified GFR prediction formulae. The performances of the estimated GFRs were compared with those of the standard GFRs measured by technetium-99m diethylenetraminepentaacetic acid. Results: Biases were similar for Chinese formula 1, the Asian formula, and Chinese formula 2 (median difference, 2.22 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 2.59 mL/min/1.73 m2 for Chinese formula 1 and the Asian formula, respectively, versus (vs) 3.69 mL/min/1.73 m2 for Chinese formula 2 [P = 0.298 and P = 0.913, respectively]). Precision was improved with the Japanese formula (interquartile range of the difference, 3.14 mL/min/1.73 m2 of the Japanese formula versus 15.53–23.06 mL/min/1.73 m2 of the other formulae. The accuracy of Chinese formula 2 was the highest (30% accuracy, 59.3% vs range 37.8–54.0% [P 70%), and the GFR category misclassification rates for all the formulae exceeded 50%. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that all six modified formulae developed in Asian populations may show great bias in elderly Chinese patients with CKD. Also, our study suggests the need for uniform measures for the assessment of CKD in the elderly to guarantee better sensitivity and specificity.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是评估中国老年慢性肾脏病(CKD)人群肾小球滤过率(GFR)的预测公式。方法:共纳入378名中国老年CKD患者。使用六个修改的GFR预测公式估算GFR。将估计的GFR的性能与通过99m二乙三胺五乙酸测量的标准GFR的性能进行比较。结果:中国公式1,亚洲公式和中国公式2的偏差相似(中值差异分别为中国公式1和亚洲公式2.22 mL / min / 1.73 m2和2.59 mL / min / 1.73 m2,与( vs.)中国式2的3.69 mL / min / 1.73 m2 [分别为P = 0.298和P = 0.913])。日本公式提高了精度(差异的四分位数范围,日本公式为3.14 mL / min / 1.73 m2,而其他公式为15.53–23.06 mL / min / 1.73 m2。中国公式2的准确性最高( 30%的准确度,59.3%和37.8–54.0%的范围[P 70%],并且所有公式的GFR分类错误分类率均超过50%结论:我们的发现表明,在亚洲人群中开发的所有六个改良公式可能显示出很大的偏见此外,我们的研究表明,需要采取统一的措施来评估老年人的CKD,以确保更好的敏感性和特异性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号