首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Interventions in Aging >Efficacy and safety of tamsulosin hydrochloride 0.2 mg and combination of tamsulosin hydrochloride 0.2 mg plus solifenacin succinate 5 mg after transurethral resection of the prostate: a prospective, randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of tamsulosin hydrochloride 0.2 mg and combination of tamsulosin hydrochloride 0.2 mg plus solifenacin succinate 5 mg after transurethral resection of the prostate: a prospective, randomized controlled trial

机译:经尿道前列腺电切术0.2 mg盐酸坦洛新和0.2 mg盐酸坦洛新联合5 mg琥珀酸索非那新的疗效和安全性:一项前瞻性,随机对照试验

获取原文
       

摘要

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tamsulosin hydrochloride 0.2?mg (TAM) and its combination with solifenacin succinate 5?mg (SOL) after transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Patients and methods: The patients were randomized into three groups: TURP (group 1), TURP plus TAM (group 2), and TURP plus TAM + SOL (group 3). Patients in group 2 and group 3 received medication for 4?weeks. The primary efficacy end points were the mean change in total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and IPSS subscores. The secondary end points included quality-of-life score, Overactive Bladder Symptom Score, and short-form voiding and storage score of International Continence Society. Results: In total, 37 men (31.8%) in group 1, 37 men (31.8%) in group 2, and 42 men (36.2%) in group 3 completed the study. In total IPSS, no significant improvement was seen from baseline to the end of treatment in groups 2 and 3 compared with group 1. However, in group 2, the decrement in the IPSS storage score was smaller than group 1 ( P =0.02), and in group 3, the decrement in the IPSS voiding score was smaller than group 1 ( P =0.05). In groups 2 and 3 compared with group 1, improvements in the quality of life score, total score of Overactive Bladder Symptom Score, and short-form voiding score and storage score of International Continence Society were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Treatment with TAM and combination of TAM and SOL did not have significant additional benefits for lower urinary tract symptoms during the early recovery period after?TURP.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是评估经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)后坦索罗辛盐酸盐0.2?mg(TAM)及其与琥珀酸索非那新(5mg)(SOL)联合使用的安全性和有效性。患者和方法:将患者随机分为三组:TURP(第1组),TURP加TAM(第2组)和TURP加TAM + SOL(第3组)。第2组和第3组的患者接受了4周的药物治疗。主要功效终点是国际前列腺症状总评分(IPSS)和IPSS评分的平均变化。次要终点包括生活质量评分,膀胱过度活动症症状评分以及国际节制学会的简短形式的排尿和储存评分。结果:第1组共有37名男性(31.8%),第2组共有37名男性(31.8%),第3组共有42名男性(36.2%)完成了研究。从第2组和第3组的总体IPSS来看,从基线到治疗结束与第1组相比没有显着改善。但是,在第2组中,IPSS储存评分的降低幅度小于第1组(P = 0.02),在第3组中,IPSS排尿评分的降低幅度小于第1组(P = 0.05)。在第2组和第3组中,与第1组相比,生活质量评分,膀胱过度活动症症状评分的总评分以及国际尿失禁学会的短期排尿评分和储存评分的改善在统计学上均无统计学意义。结论:在TURP恢复后的早期恢复期间,TAM以及TAM和SOL的联合治疗对下尿路症状没有明显的额外益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号